data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5cec4/5cec472bfbc250774be81986549f1951e2a76d9f" alt="Challenging the Ethics of Medical Experiments and Transgender Rights Artwork"
The Last Gay Conservative
The Last Gay Conservative
Challenging the Ethics of Medical Experiments and Transgender Rights
Uncover the untold stories of medical experimentation carried out on vulnerable populations and the tragic outcomes that ensued. We’re about to take a deep look into the notorious Tuskegee Syphilis Study and the disturbing experiments of Dr. John Money. Today's conversation is not for the faint-hearted — we question the rationale behind these heinous acts, and challenge our trust in science and government. It's time to dig into the dark corners of medical history, and question the ethical boundaries that were crossed.
Shifting gears, we also examine the complex issue of gender identity, particularly amongst minors. We zoom in on the Supreme Court ruling regarding LGBTQ rights and consumer choices in the context of these rights. We share our thoughts on the use of puberty blockers, hormones, and sex reassignment surgeries, and we don’t shy away from discussing the profound implications that these choices can have. As we navigate through this heated topic, remember to keep an open mind.
Towards the end, we grapple with a thought-provoking question: Why isn't the government more proactive in protecting children from potentially harmful decisions? We explore the FDA's stance on puberty blockers for gender dysphoria and the alarming trend of life-altering decisions being made at a young age. As we wrap up, we'll leave you pondering the power of the individual and the collective, and the urgent need for compassion and understanding in our society. It's a lot to take in, but we promise it's worth it.
Questions from the listeners and conspiracies from Donna. You're listening to the Last Gay Conservative. I'm your host, chad Law. Hello America, welcome to another episode of the Last Gay Conservative. It's me, chad Law. You're host with the most America's binary brother and the gayest conservative of all time, sending common sense, conservative politics through the airwaves on the only rainbow that matters the red, white and blue rainbow Folks. I want to hear from you. Don't forget our number 866, last Gay. 866, last Gay. You can text or leave a message on the message line. You can also tweet me at Last Gay Cons on Twitter or shoot us an email. Podcast at LastGayConservativecom.
Speaker 1:Well, this is my final broadcast from the Portland area and I am very excited to leave. Love Ben and I love sort of central and eastern Oregon, but man, portland is so bad. I mean two things I also realized. I know I already gave you my whole spiel on Portland, but I think there's a ladies hair color shortage, a shampoo shortage and a toothpaste shortage here. I don't know if the hygiene revolution made its way up the Pacific Northwest and the women.
Speaker 1:Why do you let your hair grow out? Okay, you're not aging gracefully, you're aging grossly. You look ridiculous. We're stringing long gray hairs and your ashy brown color. Oh God, put some gloss over it or something. Well, especially the women here, just don't take pride in how they look. No lip gloss, cracked lips, gray hair, no earrings on, no jewelry. Their purses are like hemp sacks. I mean, the nicest pieces they have are the Birkenstocks they wear. It's just a semi-expensive shoe. But man, no wonder there's no older single men with money here. I'm sure they just get on the first plane when they can and get out of here, move up to Seattle or something.
Speaker 1:Because I color my hair. I have a full head of bleach and tone on my hair. I was grabbing color at the Cosmoprof, which is a professional beauty place. I have a card and I'm putting all my stuff in the basket. I see this hairdresser and she's got this frizzy brown hair with big grays going through it. Who would ever get their hair colored by someone like that? But anyways, i start talking to her and say, oh, how's the business here? And she says I said I know in California the bread and butter money is root touch ups and highlights. She says, yeah, we do very little root touch ups here. I do some highlights, but it's all about natural. I said. Well, you should probably tell your clients that natural looks very good on very few people.
Speaker 1:The whole point of having fake stuff is so you look good. If you have saggy pancake boobs, get a boob job. If you have a beak for a nose, get a nose job. If you have a pancake ass, get a BBL, which I'm about to do, but I have to wait until I lose a little bit more weight. But oh yeah, modern medicine allows us to look and feel the best way possible and people just ignore it. No, thank you.
Speaker 1:Call me vain, that's okay, i am, i admit it But I think aesthetic is important. I mean, trust me, i've got looks for radio. I'm nothing great, but at least I try. These people are just giving up. Don't blame nature. It's so unnatural to have hair color on or plastic surgeries So vain, except what God gave you. God also made plastic surgery people.
Speaker 1:It's just a whole other world up here. I don't understand why there's this fly. Everything goes up California, goes up to Idaho, goes from South to North, and then all of a sudden you get to Portland, get to Oregon. It just skips and goes into Washington, which Seattle's funky donkey too. But you've got Bellevue and you've got other Kirkland and homes all along Lake Washington and Bainbridge Island. There's tons of places you can go that are nice.
Speaker 1:I don't know how people do it here. And then the guys here it's like the teeth are yellow, yellow, yellow. And if you live here, no offense, i'm not saying that's you, but the level of hygiene here is so low I just can't even believe it. And I've gone to dinners with clients who have brought their boyfriends and girlfriends and things, and I'm just going do you know where the shampoo is in your house? You know how to use a blow dryer. You know how to put a little lip gloss on or even a little chapstick for a guy. I mean my friends in Southern California. Like I said, they're all straight guys. You all know my group of friends that I hang out with, which I hope they all miss me Josh and Nick and Max and everyone down there. But you know at least they wash their hair, style it, put deodorant on, just could never go out of the house like that. I want to get to your questions.
Speaker 1:There have been a couple of additional big Supreme Court rulings which will be on tomorrow's show, sunday. So don't worry, i will be talking about the LGBTQ rights loss. You can no longer have someone who doesn't believe in gay marriage bake you a wedding cake. Whatever happened to refusing the right to serve anyone for any reason? I can't even believe it made its way to the Supreme Court. It's just so stupid.
Speaker 1:What happens is a common sense. It's like someone doesn't want to make you a cake, someone doesn't agree with you. Right? Don't buy from them. Don't go to that store. It's like we didn't buy Bud Light or go to Target. Why don't you make change with the power of your wallet instead of crying and whining and calling it civil rights? if a business doesn't want to serve you or your wedding, they have that option. It's not discrimination, ridiculous. They say well, these businesses can't discriminate against black people, not make a cake for black people. Actually, they can refuse to make a cake for a black person. Is that wrong? Yes, is black people need to go there? No, we are so far gone from common sense. It is absolutely astonishing to me that the Supreme Court would hear a case about graphic designers and cake makers not wanting to do work for gay couples. They don't have to do work for any couples, it doesn't matter. There's a billion other bakeries and a billion other graphic designers that they make a stink out of everything And notice the businesses. They're not making a stink, they're saying thanks but no thanks. And it has to become this whole thing and bricks get thrown through glass. And, anyways, i'm going to get to your questions.
Speaker 1:When we get back we have Donna, for the second half of the show, going over some medical experiments linking it to all this new COVID data that's dumped that no one really has an idea of because it was hidden in between submarine coverage. That whole thing was a nightmare, a nightmare for the people, but a nightmare for me. I had to see it and hear it on the news 24 seven. It's like who cares? Thing went down and didn't come back up. There's the coverage. Why don't we talk about all these people that are dropping dead from COVID vaccines, heart problems, hospitalizations? Oh no, donna will break that down for us later. All right, i'm going to take a quick break and I'll be right back.
Speaker 1:This episode of the podcast is presented by Factor Meals. As you know, i was 317 pounds two years ago and I just weighed this morning at 235. Granted, i've got about another 20 to go to get the dad bod. That is my goal, but Factor Meals helps a lot. First of all, there's endless options. Second of all, for those of us who are truly fat not these people who are like I need to lose five pounds. No, no, no. For us bigger men and women, taste is everything. The reason we are this fat is because we love the taste of food. Well, the great news is is Factor Meals tastes fantastic. They have vegan, they have vegetarian, they have keto, they have anything you need. gluten free Doesn't matter. Right now, factor Meals for you all is offering 50% off your first box 50%. And then what are they offering? another 20% off your second box. Go to factor75.com, at least explore, see if it's for you. But I'll tell you, if you order and you truly use the meal plan as intended I do just my lunches and my dinners the weight will begin to shed off like crazy. Then, folks, factor75.com 50% off your first box and 20% after that. All right.
Speaker 1:So I'm going to dive into some of your questions that you've sent in. There's some funny, some serious. I did this once before, last year, maybe even 18 months ago, and people really liked it. I do personally respond quite a bit, so that's why I don't necessarily do it on the air, but when there's a buildup of questions, i like to answer them. Let me get the personal ones out of the way. Yes, i'm so flattered. Yes, i'm single by choice, and for those of you who keep asking me to tag my significant other in things, there is not one. So, yes, i am open to marriage proposals from some of you who have written in.
Speaker 1:Look, I have to bring it up. I've never gotten any sort of attention like this my entire life, and so it's kind of fun for me, kind of new for me, but I look a lot worse in person. Don't worry, you see the best of me. However, i did get two text messages since I've been in Portland from a gentleman who said oh, i saw you out in public. You're much better looking in person than you are in your pictures. I don't know how to respond to all that, but I really appreciate all the compliments. One of the best questions I got is are you or someone you know suffering from misophilioma? Oh, it's so good. I see those commercials when I watch the Golden Girls on Hallmark channel. Every single commercial Messelfiliuma, messelfiliuma. I don't even know what that is, but I think it's so funny that someone wrote that in.
Speaker 1:For those of you who've requested my parents come on the show because you love my stories, that'll never happen, not because of me, because of them. My dad sent me an email the other day and said I think you should follow this story because he's the main reason why I'm conservative the way I am. So he you know he helps me, so I think you should follow this story. And he ends the email by saying I would help you, but I'm very busy with your mom and the dogs. Goodbye, like okay, thanks. He would never get on the air, neither would my mom, but they are hysterical And yeah, they live together in the Santa Barbara area, a little north of Ventura, in a small town called Ohai, o-j-a-i.
Speaker 1:You ever have an opportunity to get up there, you should, all right, so I'm gonna get in the first serious question here. Chad, my daughter thinks she's trans. I want to love her, but I can't live with her changing names, et cetera. Any ideas? Now, that's a very serious question, and I'm not a psychiatrist, nor am I a psychologist. What I would say to you is this you are the parent. You know what's right in your heart.
Speaker 1:Now my big thing is puberty blockers, hormones and sexual reassignment surgery. I think if you're working with the right therapist or psychiatrist and she wants to wear boys' clothes, maybe cut her hair short and see how it is again. This is just my opinion of how I would do it if I had kids, i don't think there's as much harm in that. It's when you start making permanent changes to the body is where it's rough. But you'll listen in. Actually, the interview that I just did with Donna When I was growing up, in order to get a sex change, it was like a two or three year process.
Speaker 1:You had to live as that sex, you had to function in society, keep a job. There was all these requirements before they would allow you to have a sex change, and I think that you can sort of implement those things prior. You didn't mention how old she was. I would say you know, i would also look at the symptoms on true gender dysphoria. But and the other thing that I would recommend that you read is a book called Irreversible Damage by Abigail Schreyer that really breaks down how this movement of younger girls wanting to be boys has started and really snowballed significantly through society. But I do apologize, you're going through that right now It sounds like you're a great, great mom.
Speaker 1:And also I should tell you that I have many trans conservative listeners that believe in what I talk about And for the most part, you know. Sometimes they send me things that say that's just not true or whatever. But I do believe that you and her together can make these choices. And again, what's the harm in waiting? What's the harm in taking the steps very, very slow? You know it starts with a short boy haircut or stops wearing makeup or whatever it is. Create a plan together and explain to her what could happen if she changes her mind later.
Speaker 1:All right, another question I get all the time is how do I keep my kids safe in university from propaganda? First of all, you've already done an amazing job with your kids. If they're going to university and they have a strong conservative Christian backbone, they should be able to sort of navigate themselves. However, it's always comes down to three things, in my opinion choosing the right school, choosing the right major and choosing the right extracurricular activities. So perfect example I wouldn't send my kid to a UC or a CSU school, no matter what. It just would not happen. And a lot of people will say to me. Well, the only real conservative base school is Hillsdale College in Michigan and that's small and it's expensive And that's not necessarily true. They might be the leader of conservative education higher education but there are plenty of schools that offer Christian based learning. I know Grand Canyon University is one of them. Concordia universities are also Christian based and there's several schools Baylor, for example. Southern Methodist University in Texas is another great school. They're everywhere And so you find the school that might sit in the middle.
Speaker 1:Maybe they're just a little bit left or hopefully on the right, but most universities are all the way on the left. So if you find something in the middle, then you have to make sure that y'all choose the right major. Any liberal arts is just a propaganda, brainwashing major, that's all it is. Anything communications, english, all those things are always gonna incorporate this stuff. So you wanna look at the major and the class requirements for the major and make sure there's no gender studies, women's studies, these woke titles. That will for sure be bad and a waste of time. You want your kid to get a good education. I also think psychology is a major. That's gone down the tubes If you can focus on things like engineering or graphic design or motion graphics things, where you can really get a job and the education is more focused on technical training than it is about theoretical knowledge.
Speaker 1:And then, lastly, the extracurriculars. Greek life is huge. Make sure that if you're rushing a sorority or a fraternity, or your daughter or son is that you understand the history of those Greek organizations. They do have a tendency, especially for males, to be more on the conservative side. Fraternities, but you always have these weird ones where they can't get into regular fraternities so they make their own weird off-campus fraternity. I know there's some gay fraternities out there, so keep an eye out on that. And then, as far as extracurriculars go as well, encourage your kids to participate in Christian life, in school, church, helping pastor. There was a youth pastor program where I went to school where you could slowly but surely work on that on the weekends, et cetera. Obviously, sports, but it's just about dissecting each one of those three things making sure that there are the right extracurriculars available, there's the right majors available and the right school available. Once you find those things, you'll definitely have a ensure that your child, or you, if you're looking as a teen, get a worthwhile college experience.
Speaker 1:Another question I get all the time. That makes me absolutely sick. But a few people wrote in and said at college lately sorry, i read these right off the paper So college lately has become more homophobic because of trans men and sports et cetera. How should I handle it? Well, first thing you need to do is put Laskey conservative stickers all over your car and wear Laskey conservative t-shirts all over school. I'm teasing, no, listen.
Speaker 1:the whole thing is is that just make sure people are aware that you don't agree with it And if someone does harass you or say something weird, say this is not a gay issue, it's a trans issue. I just had a major fight with someone because they've made these grocery store stickers to cover Bud Light and make it say Bud Gay. And this is not a gay issue. Dylan Mulvaney is a trans person, a weirdo, and that was the issue. But nothing to do with gay. Nothing to do with gay. And companies forever have had rainbow stuff during June with no real problem, but because of the trans war on America it's really taken gay people a step back in acceptance. So there's not a whole lot you can do directly, i think. Just make sure that you support the right cause, make sure that your opinion is known. Make sure that people know that you listened to this show. If people have questions, you can tell them that there's hundreds of thousands of people who subscribe to the belief that there can be gay conservatives on a podcast.
Speaker 1:How did I just make this all about me? I don't know. This is so typical of me, so narcissistic. No, but honestly, if you're uncomfortable, just walk away. Clearly I don't wanna give psychological advice, but if it's more something where you feel like you're getting pushed into a lump of people, just make sure you step away and don't allow yourself to get lumped in. I mean, i had to learn that much later in life than you are, way after college. But it's a good practice to make sure that you don't fall in line in places where either one side or the other side wants you to fall in line with. Also, make sure you have a good range of friends.
Speaker 1:I think one of the weirdest things I thought was all the gay people at school would all kind of huddle together in their own little group, and I was not about that at all. I like everyone and I like to hear different experiences, so I always have friends up and down the rainbow, if you will, and it's helped keep my eyes open and it's helped keep me understanding what the other side is thinking. And for the most part, what you're seeing is people that are getting protective over some really scary stuff. Chicks with dicks is a big deal for women, and I know boyfriends get upset and dads get upset and it blows back on the LGB community And that's just the situation we're in right now and the only thing we can do is be strong and be educated and show people that we don't buy into the BS either and make sure that we're preaching the separation between trans and sexual orientation. I always love these.
Speaker 1:Looks like a couple in Ohio sent an email saying our son just came out as gay. We are right wing Christians and so happy that we can give him your podcast as a resource in order for him to stay conservative while being gay. Before we heard your show, we probably would have been a lot more resistant to him coming out because of our faith and our political beliefs, but you have proven to us that is totally okay to be gay, christian and conservative. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Hey, no, thank you. That's the whole reason why I'm doing this show, because I know that I represent a lot of people out there And I also know that there are a lot of people parents who are really unsure of how a gay child has fits into the realm of their family dynamic, especially with someone who's focused on conservative values and Christian values. So thank you so much for the compliments The biggest compliment ever and make sure your son reaches out If he ever needs anything. Send a text or an email, because it is very hard coming up. You didn't mention how old he is, but I can tell you that it is very difficult coming up as a gay conservative, not with other people, but with other gay people, because they will try to force you into the narrative that they preach.
Speaker 1:So, okay, time for one more quick question, and that is Carla. Oh, in Pasadena, cool Chad. I am sick over this new law in California having to do with affirming gender and custody. What can I do to make a change or take a stand? Great question, carla.
Speaker 1:I'm actually working with some other conservatives on this issue right now. We're gonna start to get signatures and we're gonna boycott paying our California income taxes. That is the only way to send a message, as we've learned with Bud Light and Target and some of these other woke corporations. They can't arrest all of us for not paying taxes. So we're gonna take a page out of Henry David Thoreau's book and refuse to pay taxes for things that we don't agree with. But in order to do that, we need power in numbers, and so we're gonna launch an entire campaign coming up In the meantime.
Speaker 1:Keep your kids away from any public official, any government entity. homeschool them, put them in private school. California has gone. It's not even woke, it's completely, completely Marxist. Well, as you all know, i love the sound of my own voice and, of course, have run over into Donna's time, so we're gonna take a quick break and head over to the interview studio. The following segment of the podcast is brought to you by the Wellness Company a fully comprehensive telemedicine prescription and more that focuses on medical freedom and patient sanctity, without pushing any sort of vaccines or the pharmaceutical agenda. Go to twccom, chop around, look at the memberships, let them know. The last gay conservative sent you. All right, we're back in the conspiracy corner with the conspiracy queen herself. Donna, donna, how are you?
Speaker 3:I'm good Chad, How are you?
Speaker 1:Fantastic. What do you have for us today?
Speaker 3:Well, you know, it's been quite a week or a week and a half on the news between the submarine explosion and the Bytesman Biden impeachment drama and an attempt to coup in Russia, et cetera, et cetera. So what would seem more boring and tedious in comparison would be continuing information and numbers, released by both the CDC's website and in the Journal of American Medicine, about the seriousness and danger of myocarditis as a possibility and, unfortunately, sometimes a reality for those who are injected with mRNA COVID vaccines. I can't really even bring myself to refer to it as a side effect because it belittles it. It's demeaning to how troubling the situation is And yet, even though it's been documented on our own government's websites, there's so many people who will immediately shut it down and call it fake news, even though it's our own government reporting it now. And they'll call it fake news because it isn't a headline in the mainstream media, and I call them the real fake news. So when people go into denial about this, we keep hearing the same sorts of things over and over again.
Speaker 3:That's the science. The government is protecting it. So I'm going to pause right there and ask a couple of legitimate questions. Why should we trust the science or the scientists, and why should we think that the government is protecting us? So let's take a look at our own documented history, at an experiment which started in 1932, known as the Tuskegee study. According to the CDC, it was originally known as the Tuskegee study of untreated syphilis in the Negro male. It actually surprises me how many people today are not aware of this study, but it is more widely known amongst the Black community, and for very good reason. It's something that they should never forget and something that the rest of the population needs to know about and be wary of.
Speaker 1:Historically we don't have a great track record of medical interference with the African-American community or the Black community. We just it's a big stain on our flag And sadly they don't teach about it and they don't issue warnings about this stuff because they don't want us to lose this supposed faith in science or the government.
Speaker 3:Yeah well, this study targeted poor Black men in rural Tuskegee, Alabama, which was the area that had the highest syphilis rate in the country at that time, and these men were persuaded to participate in the study because they were promised free transportation to and from the hospitals, free hot lunches, free medical treatment for ailments other than syphilis and free burial, and these are things that poverty-stricken Black men probably would have found very difficult to turn down.
Speaker 3:So when the study began, it involved 600 Black men, 399 of them had syphilis and 201 did not. They were told that they were being treated for bad blood, and that's a term that could have been used to describe a number of things like anemia, for example. They were not provided with informed consent And the ones that had had syphilis were not told that they had it. And according to the Associated Press, when the study began, the discovery of penicillin as a cure for syphilis was still 10 years away And the availability of the drug was probably a few more years away to have it more widely available. So treatment in the 1930s, prior to the discovery of penicillin as a cure, the treatment was doses of arsenic and mercury.
Speaker 1:Oh God.
Speaker 3:Yeah, and according to public health service data, half of the men with syphilis were given the arsenic mercury treatment, but the other half, which was about 200 men, received no treatment for syphilis at all. And the purpose of the study was to observe the untreated or natural course of the disease until death. So let me repeat that Untreated until death, which included autopsy findings. Oh, wow.
Speaker 1:So the entire purpose of this was to watch the progression of the disease, see how it responds to this arsenic mercury cure, two things that have been found to be completely carcinogenic and toxic to the body. I mean, mercury poisoning is a real, real thing.
Speaker 3:They were not told that they have syphilis. And by 1943, penicillin was a known cure for syphilis And it was a treatment of choice for the disease. But a decision was made not to treat the untreated men with penicillin. And if syphilis is left untreated it can cause blindness, deafness, it can cause deterioration of bones and teeth, deterioration of the central nervous system, insanity, heart disease and death.
Speaker 1:So this step, so they withheld care from several people, hundreds of people. They withheld known, provable care in order for a scientific experiment to occur, for God knows for what reason.
Speaker 3:Yes, and let's not forget, they wanted to take a look at the autopsies.
Speaker 1:That is scary.
Speaker 3:It's reprehensible.
Speaker 1:Yeah, that makes sense. Why the? because I always thought memories are coming back about the Tuskegee experiment while we're speaking And I always thought the burial sort of caveat that was included in the sales pitch of why to come to the hospital and do this bad blood treatment. I always thought the burial thing was kind of off. But as we're speaking I'm realizing they wanted to include the burial so they had access to the bodies before they turned them over.
Speaker 3:Yep, it's so creepy. So the study was conducted by the United States Public Health Service, but the CDC knew about it and they refused to stop it, even after a concerned doctor brought it to their attention. The CDC maintained they did not conduct the study, but they were complicit. They were absolutely complicit. This is the same CDC who is fully aware of the complications and injuries that the COVID vaccines are causing. This study continued for 40 years until the story was reported by the Washington Star and subsequently the Associated Press in 1972. When it came out, a class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of the untreated men and a settlement was reached in 1974. When I was doing my research, one source said the amount was $9 million of the settlement and the other said there was $10 million. So it was somewhere in that neighborhood. but it wasn't until 1997 that President Bill Clinton issued a formal apology on behalf of the United States government.
Speaker 1:Wow.
Speaker 3:Yes, So I ask you how many other studies like this have been done on people that we have no knowledge of?
Speaker 1:Well, and one of the things that I always talk about is, just because they're not governmental studies doesn't mean they're not experiments. I mean you see advertising and all over social media and on billboards etc. Looking for people to do these clinical studies. The whole reason why it was the American Health Association or it is Pfizer or whatnot, is because Congress removed liability from pharmaceutical companies a long time ago. However, the CDC and the FDA still hold liability and Congress is actually supposed to be the ones that are overseeing the testing and the safety data on certain medications, on vaccines, especially So when you see these clinical trials. Oftentimes the CDC, the FDA are completely complicit, know the risks, but they know that they can put it through Pfizer, moderna, johnson, johnson, anything else, because they can't be held liable legally. Yep.
Speaker 3:You're so right about that. That's down with so many things. Okay, well, we can't do this, so we'll just find a contractor or a third party or someone else to do it and we'll disguise it essentially, but they find a way to get these things done. Why would people blindly trust the science and trust the government When there is information like this out there? it's because it's not widely known, it's not reported by the mainstream media. They don't want people to know. They don't want them to be distrustful. The whole thing where people keep saying trust the science, trust the science. No, you question the science. Science is supposed to be questioned. That's how it gets done. That's what science actually is. It's amazing to me these talking points have been pounded into people's heads and they don't even realize what they're saying. So, for anyone listening, if you previously didn't know that experiments like this have been conducted and you trusted the government to act in your best interest, you still trust them.
Speaker 3:In October of 2021, when I still use Facebook a bit I posted that activists from Black Lives Matter New York chapter were calling out the city's leadership over what they felt were racist COVID-19 vaccine requirements. I was immediately called out by an old friend of mine that said no way, i don't buy that Black people are doing that. Just show me a legitimate news source. So I instantly replied with a link to an article posted on Yahoo News about the story and he says thanks, i'll check it out. I never heard another word from him about it. Then later on I realized he deleted his comments.
Speaker 1:Oh, that's so typical. I remember the BLM pushback and there was a lot of press and media and PR that was done to massage the Black community into accepting the vaccine, because they are, very rightfully so, very hesitant about any governmental mandates of medication or testing Stuff that hasn't been proven because they've been screwed over so many times in the past. But what did they do? They had commercials and they got Black celebrities to go into these neighborhoods and get people to accept it and they paid millions and millions of dollars to run PR campaigns to make it better, Essentially shaming them into getting a vaccine instead of recognizing that their healthy fear of government interference of their health is okay.
Speaker 3:Well, just so, everyone knows at that time that that article ran, more than 70% of Black people in New York City aged 18 to 44 had not gotten the injection. Who could blame them? Good for them, Good for them. But here's the thing no one should blame anyone of any race or ethnicity for not wanting to get a vaccine. For those non-Blacks who are defending it and they assume that nothing like this could ever happen to them. what's wrong with you? Wake up. Wake up Now, Chad. you were just mentioning that a lot of the time, the studies aren't necessarily governmental, but they're still very much experiment. Are you ready for another story that'll blow your mind?
Speaker 1:Of course, bring it on.
Speaker 3:Okay, it's about one, dr John Money, who is considered by many to be the father of the trans movement. So this one began in 1965 where there were twin boys named Brian and Bruce Reimer that were born in Canada to a young working class couple, and they were healthy boys, but at seven months old they began having trouble urinating, so their parents were advised to have them circumcised. So they proceeded with that. However, instead of doing the procedure with a scalpel like it was normally done, the doctors decided to use an electric cauterizing pen. So a surge in the current entirely burnt off baby Bruce's penis and surgeons wouldn't be able to reconstruct it. And that in itself was an experiment and that's a horrible thing.
Speaker 3:And the parents were understandably distraught. They were from a religious background and a psychiatrist told them that Bruce would be unable to consummate marriage or have normal heterosexual relations, and they were understandably very distraught about this. But then a year later, they saw a doctor being interviewed on television. Enter Dr John Money. Yep, so he was from New Zealand and he was then working at Baltimore John Hopkins University and he had established the first US clinic that performed sex reassignment surgeries. So the parents were watching this very charismatic doctor describe his theory. He worked with hermaphrodite or what we call today intersex patients who've been born with both male and female sex organs, and his theory was that all babies were gender neutral, no matter their genitalia. He said that any baby could be streamed, thanks to hormone injections and surgery, into a gender chosen by others. Does that sound familiar?
Speaker 1:Absolutely. I think I remember he told the parents oh, go ahead and raise Bruce as a girl.
Speaker 3:Yeah. So the parents were desperate. They had a mutilated son and they wanted him to have some chance of a normal life, and so they saw possibly a solution and they contacted the doctor. And Dr Money was apparently pretty excited about this case because until then he'd only been able to conduct his experiments on intersex children And it wasn't easy to find a test case baby so that he could demonstrate his theory applied to all children And that then, when the world was still somewhat sane, no parent would have voluntarily submitted to raising their child as the opposite sex, purely to prove his point.
Speaker 3:But this case was doubly attractive to dr Money because Bruce had an identical twin brother, and That was what researchers call a perfect control group for Dr Money to compare Bruce's progress to Brian's and, and at the time it was much easier to surgically construct a vagina than a penis. So dr Money convinced the Rhymer's that Bruce should be raised as a female, and They were initially very ambivalent. But they were persuaded by his Intelligence and his charisma. And I'll tell you something Chad, charisma is a killer.
Speaker 3:Yeah and so these parents eventually Agreed to this, and the mother said she looked up to dr Money like a god and she accepted whatever he said. So Bruce was renamed Brenda and was castrated at 22 months old, and a Vulva was fashioned by or for her at Dr Money's hospital, and he prescribed that Brenda Should start taking female hormones when she was 12. The mother would regularly write to dr Money about Brenda's progress, and Every year, starting when they were, i think, six years old, they would go and visit him. He would interrogate them and In 1972, when the twins were seven, he published a book called Man and Woman, boy and Girl, and it was about this case, but he gave the family fictitious names and he wrote that the experiment had been a total success And the girl was happy to wear dresses and play with dolls, while her brother loved cars and soldiers and climbing trees. It said that isn't what was really going on. However, dr Money won international acclaim around the world and the idea of sex reassignment surgery for children suddenly became more acceptable because of this book. But Brenda would later say in interviews that both she and her brother knew early on that Something wasn't right and she used to tear off these lacy dresses that her mother made her wear and she had no interested Makeup.
Speaker 3:At age four She said she wanted to try out her father's razor. At age six She said she wanted to be a garbage collector. She hated playing with dolls and she always chose her brother's toys instead, and her mother kept telling her that she was just a tomboy, this poor kid. At school, brenda never fitted in. She was rejected by both the girls that she didn't really want to play with anyway and the boys, and She was bullied and even the teachers were uncomfortable around her. Sir mother said that she was very rebellious and she was very masculine and She couldn't persuade her to do anything feminine. So this is completely contrary to what dr Money wrote in his book. And Brenda had almost no friends growing up and the kids Ridiculed her. Everyone called her a cave woman and she was very, very lonely.
Speaker 3:So from the age of six, as I was saying, these twins had annual visits to go see dr Money and He would show the naked pictures of men and women and boys and girls and of adults having sex, and he, you know they wouldn't want to do certain things and he would just scream at them. He was furious until they'd obey with him and he'd force them to strip off their clothes and examine each other's genitals. He often asked them to play at thrusting movements and copulation. So he's forcing them to pretend to have sex in various positions and a lot of the time these encounters They'd be photographed, and sometimes he would summon his academic colleagues to watch up to like six of them, and they would all be watching this horrible practice going on. And he himself? He was the bisexual. He champion nudity, open marriage, group sex and hardcore pornography, and in 1980 he was accused of endorsing pedophilia and incest After he told Time magazine a childhood sexual experience, such as being the partner of a relative or Of an older person, need not necessarily affect the child adversely.
Speaker 1:Oh my god Now, when he was doing the thrusting movements and all that, was he doing Brenda and the twins together, or did yeah, yeah other people.
Speaker 3:No, he had them. He was encouraging them to do Yeah so essentially he was simulating incest. Yes, oh.
Speaker 1:God, i know a little bit about this story, but I I've forgotten some of the details.
Speaker 3:Apparently, this, i, this guy is Evil yes, and he reportedly told a Dutch academic journal that he did not see any problem with a sexual relationship Between a boy age 10 or 12 who's intensely attracted toward a man in his 20s or 30s. So Brenda Reimer told the BBC in 2000 that she thought he was perverted. She thought it was a very sick man and as she was going through all of this horror and she was getting older, she increasingly felt like she was male and She adamantly refused any more surgery to construct a new vagina. And Dr Money was saying that was essential to cementing her Ecological sex change. And on the last occasion she was dragged to see him in her early teens She ran to the roof of the building to get away from him.
Speaker 3:Although her parents and the doctors persuaded her to start taking Hormones when she was 12, which led to her developing breasts, even though I guess her voice was getting deeper, she threatened to commit suicide.
Speaker 3:She just had enough. She threatened to commit suicide if they ever took her back to see Dr Money and The parents and other doctors who were consulted could see that she was serious about this, like and and so they backed off and In 1979, when she was 14, she stopped living as a girl. Then the following year, their father took Brenda out for an ice cream and dropped the bombshell that She had been born a boy named Bruce and she'd had a box circumcision and been raised as a girl on the advice of This Dr Money. So within months Brenda changed her name to David. So instead of going back to Bruce, he changed his name to David and he started taking male hormones and had his breasts surgically removed and, according to a Friend, the Reimers appearance would gloss over why. Brenda suddenly disappeared at age 14 and David appeared and they claimed that Brenda had actually been a cousin who died in a car accident and David was a long lost brother.
Speaker 1:Yeah, that was pretty common, like especially when daughters got pregnant, for example, and she went away to live with family and she was raised as the mom's daughter or homes for unwed mothers, and yeah, there was such a social pressure. So, especially with the newness of gender dysphoria or whatever you wanna call it, this pork it didn't even suffer from gender dysphoria that he was just forced into a gender. Did we ever get any information or feedback from the brother?
Speaker 3:Brian was also very, very distraught about all of this. He's raised that he has a twin sister and then finds out that he's a brother and he was along with these visits to Dr Money. So he was being abused by this doctor as well and he was very mentally and emotionally messed up because of this. So David was in his teens and he tried to have girlfriends but it didn't work out. He told one of them he had an accident with his genitalia and suddenly the whole school knew about it and they were laughing at him. And it was shortly after that that he overdosed for the first time on antidepressants And he survived.
Speaker 3:But it was really really, really tough for him, obviously. And when he was older his brother's wife introduced him to a friend named Jane, who already had three children but she didn't have a partner. So they hit it off and they got married in 1990. But by the time David was in his 30s he lost his job, he got defrauded of his savings, he separated from his wife and he plunged into a depression and his relationship with Brian, his brother, had been difficult. And then, after they discovered they were really brothers and that he wasn't the girl Brenda, it really messed Brian up and Brian died from a drug overdose in 2002.
Speaker 3:Oh my God, yeah, david's parents. They held a small funeral and buried Brian in a secret place because they were worried about disruption from local people who never understood all of this situation. And all these people were saying that David was better off dead. It's just so sad. So two years later, after all of this stuff happened, he separated from his wife and all these financial troubles and things, he shot himself. And his parents blamed Dr Money for traumatizing their children and turning them suicidal. But they also carried a lot of guilt. And so then the mother attempted suicide and the dad became an alcoholic Poor family. Yeah, i mean, it's just an awful tragic story. And this Dr Money, he went on, he was respected. He pioneered the use of a drug treatment for sex offenders to extinguish their sex drives.
Speaker 1:Well, that's what puberty blockers are Right, and I don't know if you know this, but I would love to know how much of this information, or his fake information or whatever, was being overseen by the FDA, the CDC, who knows while he was essentially experimenting on people in Baltimore And while that's going on. Ultimately, after that, he's published this book, but how come the kids were not interviewed? How come the publishing was not substantiated? This is exactly how the government and these crazy doctors that are way more into self-preservation than they are into protection get away with essentially, murder. He's responsible for every one of those deaths and he created a mutiny of problems because, just like you said, the public around oh, he'd be better off dead.
Speaker 1:This that they hated him, they called her a caveman, him, whatever it was, and it just forced him to have no reason to live. However, he comes to do this Dr Money came to do this stuff with so much confidence and assurances that he could just live his life as a girl. No problem, put a vagina on him and live his life as a girl. And you know what, when you listen to these people about the defend transgenderism at early ages, still quote the guy, they still reference him as like he's an exalted scientist and they don't know that his study was completely botched and caused suicide And he lied.
Speaker 3:He outright lied and made things up. Yeah, in 2002, he received the Magnus Hirschfield Medal from the German Society for Social Scientific Sexuality Research.
Speaker 1:Wow, and you would think the Germans would be a little bit more sensitive to it, because this is no different than what all the Nazis did to the Jews when they were conducting medical experiments during the Holocaust.
Speaker 3:Yeah well, apparently they don't learn over there.
Speaker 1:And where's John Hopkins issuing formal apologies? Where's the CDC? And you know, the same stuff happened with Fauci when he was doing HIV stuff. And they knew that the drugs that they were handing out the antiviral drugs they were handing out were killing people at a higher rate than actual HIV was in the first place or AIDS. And again they continued to peddle the stuff and continued to kill people.
Speaker 1:Some people believe they were doing it on purpose, some believe that they were just stupid. I don't know the answer to that, but this is a continuous trend and a continuous pattern behavior of our government. And I'm sorry, but the 70s weren't that long ago, the 90s weren't that long ago. So this stuff isn't old folklore stuff, this is real stuff. And the really thing that pisses me off and upsets me is that all this information is available But you still have these idiots with masks on in the car walking around telling people they're evil for not being vaccinated.
Speaker 1:Meanwhile which we don't really see the government has removed almost every mandate. Teachers and public employees in New York that were eliminated. Their positions were eliminated for not getting vaccinated. They've all been paid out their wages and more and brought back to work. The CDC just came out and said the hospital rates are way higher for vaccinated people with the mRNA than they are for non-vaccinated people.
Speaker 1:The heart issue is a really big problem that's spreading around. Yet there's still people like Joe Idiot, biden and Kamala Harris and Pete Buttigieg and Gavin Newsom all telling us oh no, no, the vaccine worked, it worked and it didn't work. And not only that, but now we're seeing droves of what they call vaccine-injured patients that are having more problems than they would have if they just had COVID. And it's very, very scary The whole COVID vaccination thing, because that was the first mass rollout of any mRNA vaccine. That was this experiment about mRNA. That's exactly what it was, and the man who actually created the mRNA technology said this is not how it's supposed to be used, this is not going to work, this is not good for people.
Speaker 3:They did it anyway. Isn't that mind-blowing? Isn't that mind-blowing? He was out there trying to warn people. He was telling people he's the one who created it. And he was saying no, don't do this. And it was suppressed. And people say, oh no, you have to trust the science, You have to trust the scientists. Well, what is he? I'm totally blown away. And then you have states like California was the first one that declared California a safe state for underage minors who were not able to get sex change treatments in their home states to be able to come to California. How that's not It gets better.
Speaker 1:It gets better than that. They just recently passed a bill that basically, if you don't affirm your kid's gender, you disqualify for custody in a divorce and child protective services can deem that as a form of abuse, so they could take your child away if you don't affirm their gender. However, they never define what affirm means and they don't really define what gender means either, but the specific bill that was written states that they believe seven-year-olds can consciously identify what gender they are at seven years old and, no matter what they say, it's the responsibility of the parent to then accept that conclusion by a seven-year-old.
Speaker 3:Okay. So what happens? Where does the child get taken? to That just?
Speaker 1:seems like Hospital care.
Speaker 3:This just seems like a legal kidnapping system.
Speaker 1:It truly is, and I will say, looking at things holistically and constitutionally.
Speaker 1:Just as I don't agree with the California statute that it's considered abuse to withhold gender-affirming care, i also am not sure that I agree with the Florida statute that says if you are going to give a minor an operation or puberty blockers, we are going to take the child away. Custodial rights is a totally different issue And I understand why these things are being put into place from one ideal to the other, but it's not clear enough or defined enough to understand what are the steps that have to happen in order to lose custodial rights based on the state's laws. So these things are kind of haphazardly written And, as we know, when a statute or a law is left up to significant amounts of interpretation, that's when bad things really happen, because bad people that are involved in the process whether it be a child protective service agent or a judge who's overseeing the custody, or a social worker one bad apple in those bunches with the freedom to interpret this stuff as they will, will cause major, major issues psychologically and for the safety of the kid.
Speaker 3:Yeah, i just I can't believe what's going on. And yet, at the same time, if you're a parent and you have a 12-year-old that commits a heinous crime and causes a lot of financial damage, as a parent you're responsible for that financial damage.
Speaker 1:And in other situations they say oh people, they really, they're not full adults or minds not fully developed until 25 years old, And the crazy thing is is that they paint the right and they paint conservatives as these evil, And when you really look at the argument, the only thing that we're saying is just wait, just take some more time. So the decision that's made is proper. Don't go into surgery and don't go in puberty blockers which, by the way, the FDA has not approved for the use of gender dysphoria and or blocking puberty. But the concept that they think that this is a right that we're taking away from a kid is ridiculous, Because all we're saying is once you're 18, you have every right in the world to be whatever gender you want. You want to transition, you transition.
Speaker 1:But you know it used to be a three to four-year process before they would even allow that person to think about having the surgery, And you had to live as a woman for a number of years before. You had to see a psychiatrist and a psychologist for a number of years before and the decision was then made. Why are we make easier rather than harder when it's something that is so?
Speaker 3:it's just so severe, It's it makes no sense And it's wicked. I mean, this story is just a perfect example of what this does to people. How many people are going to end up committing suicide later in life that had this done when they were young children, without their mind fully developed? They didn't realize what they were doing, the parents were unable to protect them and the government condoned and encouraged this practice. And how many of these doctors that are willing to perform these surgeries are like this, dr Money Guy? How many of them are just as twisted and evil?
Speaker 1:You know they're ideologues. But the big question, going back to the whole government involvement in these studies, is why, as of now, this has been a buildup process to the point where we're not even at the brink yet, i don't think. But this trans conversation has been built up over at least the last 10 years, probably longer. This whole entire time, the puberty blockers that are being used are being used off label, which that's okay. 50% of medications that are prescribed amongst physicians in the United States are prescribed off label. That's okay. Most of those medications don't make lasting, massive impacts on someone's development and someone's future as a human being. The FDA has had years and years to use this drug in trials and actually approve it, stamp it with the correct side effects, with the correct warnings, and it's refused to do it. Why won't the FDA do it? Why won't they use the medication and actually approve it for gender affirming care and blocking puberty? They won't do it. Why? Because the results will not match what the ideal is.
Speaker 3:Yeah Yeah, it's so scary. I don't understand how anyone does a question this. Any parent would not want to protect their child against this. It's one thing if your kid's 13 and they're a boy and they want to dress like a girl and style their hair like a girl, but to do something permanent to their body, that's insane.
Speaker 1:It's insane. Listen, if there was a 16-year-old in high school with me and she came back with her boobs done from the summer between sophomore and junior year and she came back junior year and she had a big fake rack of tits, every single parent teacher would say, oh my God, i cannot believe the parents signed off on that. I can't believe that the doctor would do that. They would make that family feel like pariahs. Now they go, oh yeah, go whack his dick off or glue it on.
Speaker 3:It's become trendy.
Speaker 1:The conversation that I'm sure you know as well has always been it's not nurture, it's nature. Everyone's born this way, everyone's born gay, everyone's born whatever gender they are. But now gender is a concept, therefore it is nurture. I always say why aren't we just letting nature do its job? I really believe I was born gay. I do. That's my personal experience.
Speaker 1:But now you have all these people coming out at nine years old, eight years old, 10 years old, because they watch an episode of RuPaul's Drag Race. And they come out and it's not naturally occurring and they're not affirming or making that decision on their own, like I did, because they have all this outside influence and rather making it easier for people to essentially assign themselves a harder life, because it's harder to be gay in a predominantly straight community not really anymore, but it was It's definitely harder to be trans. Instead of allowing people to make that commitment on their own, it's almost like we're pushing them in that direction and it's very unsettling, to say the least. And this Dr Money is directly responsible for a lot of this stuff and it's very sad that he has not been discredited.
Speaker 3:Yes, so do everything you can, people to protect yourself and protect your children, because the government's not on your side. They're just not, and, if anything, they're the ones you should be questioning the most. And people who just accept this is one thing, but I see people who angrily defend it, and that's what gets to me. Why are you defending this? Why aren't you questioning anything that could be potentially harmful to yourself or to the ones that you love?
Speaker 1:Let me ask you a question, Donna How many hours can you spend talking about a submarine? Okay, the thing went down, it didn't come back up. There's the news They're all dead. or it's with the Malaysian plane, which is what I think.
Speaker 3:Well, and the Navy knew about this basically right after it happened, but no one was reporting that. They just drew out the story and all this suspense around it.
Speaker 1:Oh, and all these experts and were focused on all the wrong things when it comes to gender and children, instead of improving what we really need to improve, which is just everyone's life quality period, and it's disastrous, and I hope it gets better very soon.
Speaker 3:I do too, and, as always, i will be posting links to my sources. On my Twitter profile, i can be found as Conspiracy Queen. My username on Twitter is smartblonde007, and I encourage anyone to see it for themselves.
Speaker 1:Awesome, donna. As usual, this is a fantastic interview. I love what you bring and you get me all fired up, so I think I'm going to go for a run and then see if I need to have a vulva made for myself.
Speaker 3:Please don't do that.
Speaker 1:Hey, at least I'm over 18. I don't look like I'm over 18.
Speaker 3:Oh yeah, regardless, just don't do that.
Speaker 1:All right. Well, thank you so much for being on the show and we'll see you next week.
Speaker 3:Thank you Have a great weekend, thank you.
Speaker 1:Well, on that, folks, more exclusive content. you can't get anywhere else other than the last gay conservative. And, with that being said, we'll be back tomorrow. This is Chad Law, reminding you of what Reagan once said A stronger defense is an investment in peace. God bless you, president Reagan, and may God save America.
Speaker 2:You just listened to the Last Gay Conservative podcast hosted by Chad Law. Please visit us at lastgayconservativecom for this episode and others. We're also on Spotify, apple Podcasts, u2, and wherever you listen. If you like the show, please like, subscribe and share. Find us on social. At Last Gay Conservative, we proudly support the following causes the Convention of States Action, the National Rifle Association, the Heritage Foundation and Big Brothers Big Sisters of America. Disclaimer the views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent. The Last Gay Conservative is a production of Ben Wright Media. All rights reserved 2022.