Speaker 1: 0:00

It's time. From Newport Beach, california, the sun is shining, the beaches are packed and the waves are rolling in, all while the last gay conservative prepares to share more truth with America. He's America's binary brother, the holiest homo and the gayest conservative of all time working to restore common sense conservative politics in the American household. Welcome to the Last Gay Conservative Podcast. Here's your host, chad Law. As your president, I will do everything in my power to protect our LGBTQ citizens from the violence and oppression of a hateful foreign ideology.

Speaker 4: 1:13

Believe me, hello America, it's another big day in politics and Trump land Liberals are melting down left and right. You know, it's interesting because I've played some sports. I'm super competitive but I'm not athletic. So I play golf, as you know, and we get super competitive. I play in contests and tournaments, I'm on a couple of leagues, et cetera.

Speaker 4: 1:38

But the funny thing is is that when I play with with good people and I'm fairly matched and I lose, I immediately find out or try my best. Sometimes you just have a bad day, but I immediately look in or look retrospectively at what I did. Was it just a calamity of errors? Was my swing off? Is my shoulder sore, you know? Figuring out what it was that made me lose and making adjustments for the next game. So I stupidly thought, maybe, just maybe, these liberals could learn something from their massive loss across the board. And so I knew the chaos would be there. But I didn't know that they would just go back to the same old playbook Impeachment, nazi, racist, authoritarian. I mean, come on, guys, don't you have anything new? You have any marketers in your war room? What happened? All those fun, little cool, little quirky names that the biden camp came up with. So these liberals are hysterical and I've never seen anything like I mean.

Speaker 4: 2:38

I thought the first trump administration was bad. I think they're worse. They're emboldened and they keep going and the polls are all showing that on most of the issues, trump's overall approval rating is above 50. And most of his major executive issues that he signed they have full support of. You know which ones they don't support, which is weird. And again, these are polls, guys. So you take it with a grain of salt. Uh, the Panama canal talk, greenland, canada being the first state, and the Gulf of Mexico, anything like that. All the international stuff is getting low approval ratings on the polling. But the trans issue, the girls in sports, all the cutting doge everything else is like 70 to 80 percent approval. I mean that's massive, that's bipartisan. I mean there's Democrats out there that are going, yeah, and that's what I don't understand their hatred of Elon Musk and Doge. And that's why this reaction is really telling me something. This is really bad guys, like what they've created in Washington through the last 50, 100 years. This is really bad. I mean the court institution that they've created and the way that they've learned to enrich themselves and enrich their comrades with our tax dollars. They can hide and sneak and create agencies and do things.

Speaker 4: 4:00

I recently saw I think Politico put up a post of Rubio saying how much he values USAID back when he was a senator, and Lindsey Graham as well. Well, a lot of people valued USAID. I mean, it started in the 60s and just like everything else, it started very well. It started good, it started with positive intentions. It just didn't become that with positive intentions. It just didn't become that. So when Graham and Rubio and people are out in the past talking about the benefits of USAID, they're speaking off of whatever marketing speak or whatever the chairman of that agency has jammed down their throats or an internal memo. They don't really know what's going on. They read these manufactured reports that look good on paper and they're good talking points.

Speaker 4: 4:48

I mean it's so funny. It's like my friend used this example and I don't agree with it, but I think it's a funny example. So I have a gay friend who's very much in the middle and I was talking to him about that stupid Politico clip, because he's the one that sent it to me, and I said kind of what I just said to you and he goes. You know what? That does make sense he goes. I used to really like Chick-fil-A, but then when I found out how homophobic and Christian they were, I hated Chick-fil-A and I said exactly, usaid. There was no reason not to like them or support them, because no one knew what the hell was going on. That's why this stuff was such a surprise. Well, some people knew, and those are the ones that are giving you the big reaction.

Speaker 4: 5:25

So I think we're uncovering like trillions of dollars worth of fraud here, and I think we've only sort of touched the newly fresh powder on the tip of the iceberg of the kind of fraud and theft and abuse and mismanagement that we're going to find by auditing. If you think about it, this is the first time an outsider, third party agency has come in and audited every single agency. See, the agencies are primarily working in silos, other than the leaders that are appointed by the Senate or the president, and the president they work in silos. So if the EPA wants an audit, they go get their own auditors different from defense, different, and that's why they can always kind of fudge the numbers and the results. And then all these inspector generals they're just as guilty because what they've been doing is reporting on a lot of the waste but not really offering any sort of solutions, and that's what Doge has been doing is they're auditing and making recommendations to the president at the same time on the entire executive branch of the government, or the entire federal government, if you will. So because of that, we're going to start to see the way that these different bureaucracies have learned to sink their teeth in and hide money and do all the weird things that you saw at USAID.

Speaker 4: 6:48

I think USAID is just a tiny little example of what we're going to pull out of human health and defense, some of these other places. We're going to start to see all kinds of weird financial transactions and legal transactions happening around Washington DC, where all the players, the recipients of some of these bogus contracts, are in federal employees that have worked magic in order to get certain people paid, et cetera. We're going to see all of this sort of house of cards come crashing down and it's obviously freaking them out. Yeah, wikileaks, believe it or not, actually tore the story apart with basic Google trends data. Uh, over time, searches have exploded for Swiss bank account. How discreet is a Swiss bank account? How to open offshore banks at 3am. Fastest way to wire money before an audit? Do you need a passport for the Cayman Islands? All these searches in the DC area are 400 percent above their normal trend levels. The search for the word lawyer has increased 400 percent, according to Google Trends and WikiLeaks.

Speaker 4: 8:00

So it just comes to show you that there's a lot of people in DC right now that are trying to figure out a way to hide their money, hide their assets, not get fired, avoid taxes. And it's because they know the jig is up, because the deeper we dig, the more apparent it's going to get. And I, like I said, I think we're just barely touching the dusting of snow on the tip of the iceberg. I actually predict that we could probably find 20 to 25 percent of our entire deficit in waste, and I think what drives me most crazy is that all they're doing is throwing the same playbook that they used against Trump the first term anti-Trump just block everything, block everything, block everything. And they're just doing it to Elon.

Speaker 4: 8:48

And it's just ridiculous because, first of all, elon doesn't need to steal money from the government. That's your first mistake hiring all these people who are desperate for money and have full access to all this taxpayer dollars in the treasury, but, aside from that, nothing is being done without Trump's stamp of approval and nothing is being cut off that is imperative to the health, safety or wellness of people here in this country and outside of this country. So I just wanted to give you guys a little doge rant and let you know that what they're doing is they're really getting. This is exactly what's supposed to be happening. This is the reaction that we want and this is how it should be, and I'm not going to do the whole show on doge, but I'll tell you what. These guys are smart, they're non-biased and they really just want to save American people money. That's it, the problem that I have. I always have a problem.

Speaker 4: 9:47

One thing that we need to kind of take a step back at is for an agency of any kind to come in and find and again, these numbers aren't the actual numbers, I'm just using it as an example but before I get my fact checkers texting me while I'm on the air oh, you did, ok, sorry, alyssa's telling me that the fact checkers are blocked when I'm on the air, so I don't get the messages. Okay, that's good. Well, thank you. No, what I was saying was is that if any agency comes along and finds $50 million in the faltering, horrible social security administration or Social Security program that we have and they say, wait a minute, there's 50 million or 50 billion or whatever you want to call it even $1 going out to someone without a Social Security number or someone who hasn't paid in to Social Security, that's all you're doing is getting your money back, which, if they invested it properly, they could have grown the balloon so big we'd never have to worry about it. But that's a different story.

Speaker 4: 10:45

Every single person in America should be outraged about that, and I don't know if it's because these people who are these liberals don't pay taxes or they don't work really hard, or they just really don't care about money. I don't know what the reason is, but anyone who's ever given a dollar of their own money that they worked for to the government in order to receive the protections and policies and programs that we want. And then you hear about waste going to these shadow accounts forget feeding people, forget any humanitarian aid. This is literally just social security dollars going to people. Chuck Schumer, everyone should be on their feet clapping oh my gosh, thank you so much, because that is money that should be left in the program and will help it from going bankrupt.

Speaker 4: 11:34

But they're screaming about it. They're saying that we're trying to shut off Social Security, steal data and information. No, we're not. Why are you so upset that they're finding waste? Why Could it be that a lot of this waste is lining your pockets or your constituents pockets? I honestly don't exactly know how to tie a lot of these dollars, like the social security thing. How do we tie that back to a politician? I'm sure there's a way, but in the meantime we should be celebrating any money we can save the people who are enrolled and who have paid into the social security program. We should also feel the same way about medicaid. You know if there's a bunch of medicaid waste.

Speaker 4: 12:10

Also, when they find all these contractors that are still getting paid but they're not doing any work anymore. Their contracts have expired. But because of oversight or whatever, someone oh no, you can't stop. Oh, my god, and it's just on overdrive, freak out. And all I can sit here and say to myself is who in God's name wouldn't be happy about this? Who in God's name would fight saving people money and whether or not they're stealing or enriching themselves or whatever it is, at least it says one thing that we already know, but it confirms it for us, democrats don't care about your tax dollars.

Speaker 4: 12:49

They feel they own that money. They also feel that they are smarter than you to make decisions about where that money goes in order to keep you and your family safe, supported and comfortable, and all the other things that come along with it education, roads, et cetera. Isn't that weird? Just found the whole thing a little strange. Only in today's Democrat party, with these left elitist liberals, could you make identifying and removing government waste tax dollar waste a partisan issue. Only them. I'm going to take a quick break. I'll be back after these words.

Speaker 3: 13:26

Why do couples choose a Sleep Number Climate 360 smart bed. Can it keep me warm when I'm cold? Wait, no, I'm always hot. Sleep Number does that? The Climate 360 smart bed lets you adjust up to 30 degrees cooler to warmer.

Speaker 5: 13:37

Can I make my side softer?

Speaker 3: 13:39

Can I make my side firmer? Sleep Number does that. We know 80% of couples sleep too hot or too cold. Our smart bed cools and warms either side so you both sleep comfortably sleep better together on the climate 360 smart bed.

Speaker 4: 13:54

Shop now at sleepnumbercom I know, I know all right, and we're back just being scolded by my awesome team about how I said I didn't want to talk about Doge today because everyone else was, and then I spent 10 minutes on it this morning. So I apologize to that point. It is a little bit of a double edged sword because I purposely try to not do the same content and everyone else's. I used to get so frustrated when I was younger and I'd listen to KFI 640 am in LA and it would. You know, glenn Beck would usually start, and then Rush, and then Mark Levin and these guys, john and Ken that I loved, but nonetheless the days where they just all talked about the same stuff were terrible for me. Yeah, they all had their sort of unique opinion, but it just got repetitive and boring and I never want to do that to you guys. I want to give you guys original content. However, if there's something you want me to talk about and you want my opinion on a mainstream issue or something that's being covered elsewhere, just text 866 last gay, just send us a text. Well, I can tell you one thing I am really pissed off at our judiciary system and I mentioned it a bit last episode and I've talked about this for years these men in black. It's.

Speaker 4: 15:09

Mark Levin's first book was called Men in Black and it was about the Supreme Court, but now it applies to the entire judiciary. These judges think they're God. It is really scary and they believe they have more power. And these are like regional federal judges that live in like Seattle or the Supreme Court. These aren't Supreme Court justices, ok, these are rinky dink judges all over the country, hundreds of them that want to use their bench to legislate instead of actually analyzing, bipartisanly analyzing cases and ruling based on the Constitution's originality. In other words, if there's a gun control lawsuit, if Congress comes out with a new law, which Congress writes the laws, and it gets challenged in court, it's not up to the judge to write a decision that includes her opinion about firearms, which happens. It's up to the judge to say the Second Amendment clearly states X, y, z. If limits need to be added to the Second Amendment, that is up to Congress. And the same thing comes to the executive branch. Now we know Donald Trump is overreaching. This is how he used executive orders last time Get them early, get them out, let them block it and scale it up to the Supreme Court, or at least they have to go against the court of public opinion, which everyone knows.

Speaker 4: 16:33

All this stuff is good. Only an idiot, like I said, only an idiot can get mad about catching and stopping wasted money. Catching and stopping wasted money, I mean, I just don't understand this. I mean, if someone finds money, it's so crazy. No, these judges, no, leave it. You can't touch the funds that have been going to non-people in Social Security, people with no Social Security number, never paid into the system, getting maximum Social Security benefits for years.

Speaker 4: 17:07

However, these judges think that they're entitled to legislate from the bench. And this is our constitutional crisis, folks. This is our constitutional crisis because now we have a political and it's on both sides, but we have a political judiciary that was never supposed to be political. How do we know that? How do we know that the founders never intended the judiciary to include politics? Because it's the only branch of government that isn't elected or accountable to the American people, because, at that time, judges were scholars, philosophers, legal experts, constitutional experts. There was a time when judges could put their robe on and take their personal shit out and actually judge based on the Constitution. The founders could have never predicted or assumed the judiciary would get infested with wannabe congressmen that have on black robes. It's just like this guy in Seattle that just blocked Trump's executive order about no child trans surgeries. You can't do that. That's not up to you. You can push it back to Congress, maybe, but you don't get to listen to a case for 45 minutes or an hour and then just send out these rulings and expect it to be law. It's insane. And so now we were all excited. You know, we were the guys with the hot chick Trump and his stuff was our hot chick and unfortunately we started making out in January and then they went home for their early meeting and left us high and dry because the judges did that. Essentially, if you're understanding my metaphor for blue balls, that's what's happening. We can't move forward if these judges think that they can decide whether something is legal or not, and then that is that they're the God law signed off. I don't know if you guys know much of you know I always talk about Reagan and um. It's interesting because I believe this accelerated politicizing of the judicial system was based on Reagan's executive orders and what he was able to do through Congress, through the American people, as a president in his first term. Democrats vowed to never let that happen again. The judges that legislate from the bench are the same judges that voted for slavery to keep slavery. That protected the KKK.

Speaker 4: 19:37

Jim Crow, reagan's attorney general, really led the fight of originalism with the Constitution within the judiciary, ed Meese, and he talks about cases, major Supreme Court cases where they did not anchor their decision in constitutional law. And always it comes back up, just like Roe v Wade, just like Brown versus education. So I want to read you this passage from him when he was giving a speech. I think it was 1986. When the Supreme Court and Brown versus Board of Education sounded the death knell for official segregation in the country. It earned all the plaudits it received.

Speaker 4: 20:18

But the Supreme Court in that case was not giving new life to old words or adapting living or flexible constitution to new reality. It was restoring the original principle of the constitution to constitutional law. The Brown Court was correcting the damage done 50 years earlier when Plessy v Ferguson, an earlier Supreme Court, had disregarded the clear intent of the framers of the Civil War amendments to eliminate the legal degradation of blacks and had contrived a theory of the Constitution to support the charade of separate but equal discrimination. Similarly, the decisions of the New Deal and beyond that freed Congress to regulate commerce and enact a plethora of social legislation were not judicial adaptations of the Constitution to new realities. They were, in fact, removals of incrustations of earlier courts that had strayed from the original intent of the framers regarding the power of the legislator to make the policy.

Speaker 4: 21:22

It is amazing how so much of what passes for social and political progress is really the undoing of old judicial mistakes. Mistakes occur when the principles of specific constitutional provisions, such as those contained in the Bill of Rights, are taken by some as invitations to read into the Constitution values that contradict the clear language of other provisions. In other words, the provisions of the Constitution do not outweigh the values of the Constitution, which are democracy, freedom, rights and limited government. All right, on that note, I got to take a quick break. I'll be back after you know what.

Speaker 2: 22:07

You've got too much on your plate to worry about what to put on it next. That's where we come in. We're Factor, your one-stop shop for fresh, fully prepared meals packed with premium ingredients and ready to heat and eat in two minutes flat. Did we mention, delivered right to your door? Yeah, we got that covered too. Looks like eating well just got a whole lot easier.

Speaker 4: 22:37

All right and I'm back. I went to church yesterday. It was a beautiful service. I go to the Mariner's Church in Newport Beach.

Speaker 4: 22:46

I was actually sort of a separate part of the church and for whatever reason I never do, but I decided to kind of hang out. Know me, I usually hate everyone so I don't stick around. But I did for some reason yesterday morning and I got to chatting with some people and politics came up, et cetera. And you know I use a term that's called religious or spiritual materialism and it's when someone, I believe, is using their religion or their spiritual knowledge to acquire things or services from someone or whatever. They're using it to benefit themselves in a non-spiritual way. Those people and I'm saying because there was a group of these people and they were being very, very judgmental, and of course I can't keep my mouth shut so we get into this debate and what do they start doing? But just cherry picking pieces out of the Bible that are contradicted by other pieces, or are puzzle pieces that have to be put in the context of the entire story in order to understand. And I said to them this is the problem that people have with many of us Christians, especially Christians that consider themselves fundamentalists. The problem that many people have is that they pick and choose parts of the Bible and the religion that appeal to them, like Westboro Baptist, the church that's got all the signs that says God hates fags, and all the horrible church that's got all the signs that says God hates fags, and all the horrible, horrible, horrible things. But that's exactly what the Democratic Party is doing right now. I mean, if you think about it, since George W Bush even, but again going back, obama really created this, but since Obama, which is where we saw the birth really in the pushing of the 1619 project on top of Michelle Obama and all of their minions for years claiming that our constitution was too white, only written for men, needs modernization. It creates a wealth disparity. I mean every single critical point. For years my liberal friends have told me that the Constitution needs to be gutted. They have been anti-original originalists is what we call it but they've been anti-Constitution since I can remember the Democratic Party hates the Constitution. So when I look at the news and I see these guys waving the Constitution around, I'm like what are you even doing? You're an idiot. And they're just picking and choosing pieces that they think helps their case, but it doesn't. And I think what really is crazy is all they're doing is shooting the messenger, elon and the other leaders that are finding this fraud. Elon didn't do the fraud or the corruption, neither did Donald Trump.

Speaker 4: 25:46

Congress created it. They created a system so complex and so empowered to legislate because they're too lazy and stupid. So they've empowered all these bureaucracies, but guess what? The bureaucracies roll up to the executive branch. Ok, so I just want to clear this up because I think this is very important and the judges have said things so strangely. But the Constitution is very clear.

Speaker 4: 26:14

The power of the purse is within Congress, more specifically, within the House of Representatives. They have what we call the congressional appropriations power. They appropriate where the money goes on from approved budgets. However, the line items are generally pulled from big pots of what they call discretionary spending, and then that bureaucracy agency, whatever you want to call it can, at their discretion, spend those funds the way they want to. But once the discretionary funds get to that bureaucracy, those funds are then managed by the executive branch. So for a judge to say, oh, you can't access that, you can't access information that's not constitutional, how You've already given the money to the branch. And hey, we didn't create this bureaucratic nightmare. This is Democrats all the way since the beginning of time. And hey, we didn't create this bureaucratic nightmare. This is Democrats all the way since the beginning of time. I mean since FDR, before FDR. Democrats created this bureaucratic mess and they've done it so they can protect whatever it is they're protecting either indirect or direct benefits.

Speaker 4: 27:21

And, like I said earlier in the program, any fraud or waste should be celebrated, and Mark Levin said it this week at some point. He said look, there's two types of spending the one that I just said, which is discretionary funds that have been appropriated by Congress, and then there's waste and fraud and corrupt spending. So even if we remove the USAID argument or we remove any sort of political argument around spending, there's still probably a trillion dollars in fraudulent payments that we need to address. Every single person should be happy about that in the world. So if they're not, then what's going on? You know, it reminds me of the cheating boyfriend. Let me see your phone? No, why, why, if you have nothing to hide? Let me see your passcode no. And it blows up into a huge argument and of course, the cheating boyfriend always says oh my God, you don't trust me. It's always like that and they dig deeper and deeper into the lie Psychology 101. And so that's what the Democrats are doing. I mean, there's obviously something going on, because I've never seen any reactions like this.

Speaker 4: 28:27

And you would think a couple of them you know a couple of the ones that aren't so crazy, like Schiff or Warren, but you would think a couple of these Democrats would come out and say you know what? I'm not against finding fraud, I'm not against fighting corruption, finding corruption. I am against cutting these programs. Fighting corruption, finding corruption. I am against cutting these programs. We would just like a seat at the table to make this an organic conversation amongst us in order to feel heard and to make sure that the programs that are most important to their constituents stay put.

Speaker 4: 28:56

But they don't, they don't. They keep freaking out, and while they're freaking out, they're literally saying F you to you and me. How can you not care about a trillion dollars of wasted money that we've worked hard for? And it's got to be because these people have really not had to work very hard in their life? I don't get it.

Speaker 4: 29:14

I mean, I think about when I was younger my parents split up my blood dad, who I have no relationship with. But my stepdad is like my dad. But my mom for a few years was a single mom on a teacher's salary. It was not fun. I actually didn't know that we were broke because my mom did such a great job of keeping us happy and supported and I don't know what we would do without her. But in conversation, since you know she's confided in me how hard it was, how difficult it was to make the mortgage payment and keep us fed and there's all kinds of things. And I think to myself here's my mama teacher. She's already forced to pay ridiculous union dues, even though she doesn't agree with it. Taxes come out of her check, say $100 a week or whatever it is. I mean that is, especially at that time, like two weeks of groceries, tons of gas.

Speaker 4: 30:08

So these people are so out of touch they don't realize that even if a trillion dollars only equals $10 per person in the entire country back in our pocket, it still makes an impact. They want to say, well, it's only 1% of the federal. But oh, these numbers are so small. Oh, 50 million here, 50 million there, what the fuck? What's 50 million here for trans? What's the? What planet do these people live on? I don't get it. And so if there's no indirect and direct benefit, then the only other explanation for the way they're acting is they're just ramping up their behavior so bad.

Speaker 4: 30:47

So Americans refocus on this and not on their epic failure from before, and they're waving around the Constitution talking about appropriations, which Congress is still limited. It's not a lot, but they have limited appropriation power. Once it becomes discretionary funding in an agency, it's therefore considered executive managed, executive branch managed, because all those branches roll up to the president. I mean, if you think about it kind of like in a corporate setting, oftentimes the annual financials and budget are decided by a team of executives or the board of directors. Okay, and they'll set aside the money for digital or whatever after they get the inputs from everyone around. I've worked for these companies for a long time, so I know. However, once that money is allocated from the board, they expect then the executive, who's the CEO, to be responsible for the day-to-day of those funds, and he has the discretionary power to move funds from one bucket to the other. That's essentially what happens with us. The Congress decides on buckets. They send it over to the agencies Now, if they are line items and they say a million dollars for a tank, you know, $10 million for toilet paper for every federal office in the world.

Speaker 4: 32:06

I don't know. But if there are lined items, that's not discretionary spending. That's spending you have to use for that item that's been allocated from Congress. That can't be touched from the executive branch, in my understanding of limited appropriations or unlimited appropriations from Congress, depending on how you look at it. But for a judge then to turn around and say no, it's unconstitutional, without any real sources or backup, these judges are activists and what's happened is is the Democrats have created a fourth branch of government, which is the bureaucracy. The Democrats have created a fourth branch of government, which is the bureaucracy, but in order to protect the bureaucracy, they engage with unions, judges and lawyers to keep their schemes going.

Speaker 4: 32:54

And all you're going to see in the media is one or two stories about how someone's social security check showed up two weeks late because of Elon. It's baffling to me that they can run around with a constitution and I know you all see right through it. I know you see that it's BS and I know you can see more so that it's giving us political blue balls. But these judges have got to be stopped, these activist judges who are trying to legislate from the bench. It has to stop. The Constitution is very clear about how this works and you know there's nothing in the Constitution about district judges. This is all something that's been set up through Congress. They put together this judicial mess, if you will, and they realize that they could use it to their advantage, when it's very clear in the Constitution that the judicial branch is not supposed to be political, and we know that because they're not elected. The framers. If they wanted politics involved in the judicial process, they would have had judges be elected officials, not appointees.

Speaker 4: 33:56

And when you have people like Elon Musk, I mean he's volunteering his time. So the other day I saw a tweet from him and he said that they were going to, in the treasury, immediately act on like three or four new steps and I guess some of them aren't even that new, these steps. And so basically, what he said was from now on going forward, when treasury makes a payment or any of the agencies that have discretion to make those payments through the treasury system, one, it must have a coded category. This is like accounts payable 101, guys. The fact that we're having this conversation on Twitter and I think most of us have been wrongly assuming these things are happening and we say well, there's no accountability. How do we know what's going where? Well, there's inspector generals. Well, the inspector generals have been installed for many years and they're not finding this stuff, so obviously they're not doing their job.

Speaker 4: 34:50

If Doge can find hundreds of billions of dollars in the first three weeks of a presidency and inspector generals have been around for even one presidential term and not been able to dig up a few dollars or alert everyone of the potential fraud, they deserve to get fired. They're not doing their job. You can't fire us. Why? Your job as an inspector general is to make sure this stuff doesn't happen, and it's happening on your watch. Get the hell out, because guess what? These people can be greased. Their palms can be greased. They can also benefit. That's all. It is is a big power grab on Capitol Hill in Washington. It's not about results. It's all about how you do things, not about what you do.

Speaker 4: 35:36

But not one Democrat has come and said hey, I'm not against cutting spending. I'm certainly not against cutting fraud. I mean, the champions of Medicaid and social security talking about the Republicans want to take away everyone's social security. Social security and Medicaid are the lifeblood of the United States. All the crap they say. And then here comes Elon, who's found probably a hundred billion dollars in false payments going to people with no social security number. You would think that social security champions would say, oh my God, thank you so much. You're validating that our program does work. There's just problems and fraud involved where we can make it whole again. Maybe. I doubt $100 billion is enough to do that, but you understand what I'm saying.

Speaker 4: 36:22

Notice the double standard, notice the media. This is really scary. This is the constitutional crisis we're in. Anything else they're talking about the constitution. Tell them to go back to 1619, where they belong, because 1619 is how they really feel. Like they talked to us about the 2025 project, 1619 is how they really feel about the Constitution. Okay, so they can wave it around, talk about it all they want and talk about the powers they've given themselves, but at the end of the day, they're not being American. They're not helping anyone by being obstructionists. Come to the table with solutions. All you're doing is complaining, blocking, complaining, blocking. Where is the solution? Elizabeth Warren, you don't want your little consumer credit agency to go bad.

Speaker 4: 37:11

Before Trump took office, you should have had a plan to discuss with him how you're going to work to address some of the fraud and some of the blatant regulations that they've put out there that have hurt Americans, lost them money, but she didn't. Usaid could have gotten ahead of the blatant regulations that they've put out there that have hurt Americans, lost them money, but she didn't. Usaid could have gotten ahead of the ball too, but they just thought it would be business as usual and no one would ever have the audacity to look into a consumer protections or an aid agency the names crack me up USAID. There wasn't any aid happening. There were training journalists. Last episode I put a clip of Samantha Powers who ran it. She said I'm training journalists and saving people from Ebola coming to America, give me a break. So yeah, I'm pissed off at these judges. I'm pissed off at these congressmen and senators, because you're blocking Trump's electoral mandate and all you're doing is obstructing progress. And if you were that passionate about some of these programs, you would come to the table with solutions.

Speaker 4: 38:12

Listen, I know Donald Trump. I'm not his best friend, but I've been studying and watching the guy for a very long time. He appreciates innovation, ingenuity. He appreciates negotiations. So it's like all these people at education come to the table and have a conversation. I have a friend who's a mortgage broker and he's having a really hard time with the interest rates right now and his company was talking about ending the arm of the mortgage his type of mortgages that he runs and laying him off and five other people because the volume of transactions isn't there. So my friend could have easily sat back and started to look for another job or whatever. But he said to the owner look, this isn't fair, because this is what's happening with our system and this is where we need our leads to come from. And so they work together to make some adjustments. He didn't go in and go well, it's your fault, I'm not making sales. He said look, you know there's this thing and blah, blah, blah. And so they work together. They fixed it and now everyone's job is saved and everything. They're getting a lot more volume because they fixed the direction of the leads.

Speaker 4: 39:16

Why aren't any of these people coming forward and say look, we know education is is fucked up. We just can't figure out how to get around it. Maybe Doge can help. They're always talking about working across the aisle and working with runs. They just won't, and so they're back to the same old game plan. But what's happening is is that now they have the judicial system on their side to prop them up and block things that need to happen.

Speaker 4: 39:40

Not all executive orders are going to be constitutional, however. There has to be a real challenge to an executive order or to a law in order for it to be in federal court. These challenges are all pre-written because they knew what was coming, so they pre-wrote these lawsuits already. That's why Trump literally finishes the signature of the pen and then the lawsuit gets served to the clerk Really weird. But these are all pre-written lawsuits the trans, the birthright citizenship all of it pre-written, ready to pull the trigger, from a team of hundreds of lawyers to cherry-picked regional judges that have been activists and not judges their entire political and legal careers, and that's how they get away with it.

Speaker 4: 40:24

That is the system that they've created and we've got to stop, because they're saying we, the Democratic Party, not even just people, but we, the Democratic Party, are more powerful than the American people. We, the Democratic Party, with our judges and our lawyers, are more powerful than the American people. Really, think about that. Folks Think about that. They do not care how you're doing, they do not care about you know. They talk about the prices and inflation and Putin's price hike and all this stuff and they act like they care. But here is actual, not marketing speak, but actual solutions, actionable items, key performance indicators, physical work happening to fix some of these things that they like to rave about and they're blocking it why.

Speaker 4: 41:14

There is something really wrong with this picture, really really wrong. The sooner the Supreme Court can intervene, the better. And you know for the Democrats to say, well, trump's just holding out for the Supreme Court because they're all conservative? No, they're not. They are non-conservative. They're not all originalist judges.

Speaker 4: 41:34

Not all of them follow the sort of Ed Meese doctrine we talked about. Amy Comey Barrett's one of them. She's a rhino, so is the head justice. So, no, it's not a shoe in for some of these things. And, as I shared earlier, all these judicial decisions that they're making right now, they're all just going to end up being undone, if not by the Supreme Court this year, more so down the road, like Roe v Wade, because ultimately they're just not constitutional. They're provisions of the Constitution that are being massaged to supersede the general principles or value of the Constitution. That is the crisis we are in, folks. All right, I'm going to switch gears a little bit when I come back and talk about a fun new survey I just saw about liberal women. Try to end on a little bit more of a fun note. I'll be back after these words, hey guys, this is Justin from Collars Co.

Speaker 5: 42:28

And today I want to talk to you about the Dress Collar Polo. When we conceived of the idea for this brand, the Dress Collar Polo was the ultimate launch product. It gives you the comfort of your favorite t-shirt or polo shirt, but gives you the look of a traditional dress shirt. But but gives you the look of a traditional dress shirt, but with an English spread collar. It's made from a lightweight, super comfortable six-way stretch fabric that is sure to keep up no matter what you're wearing. Whether you wear it under a suit, under a sweater or even by itself. The dress collar polo is super versatile and sure to be your go-to shirt.

Speaker 4: 42:59

All right, we're back. Let's talk about liberal women. You know me, I've always had an opinion about them being very homely. Cat lady-like Want to listen to a little clip of montage of someone talking to liberal women on the streets, and then let's get into the gut of why they're so miserable.

Speaker 5: 43:17

So if you guys could change the Constitution in one way, how would you change it?

Speaker 6: 43:21

Perverse Gov Major. I was literally going to say legalize abortion, Maybe abortion laws? You know Rights to abortion, like transgender rights to have surgery without necessarily parental consent. Yes, you have freedom of speech, but that doesn't mean you have a right to sit there and scream at someone because they choose to change their gender or they love the same sex, things like that.

Speaker 1: 43:42

So should we add trans rights to the Constitution?

Speaker 6: 43:45

Absolutely Definitely adding in policies that make health care more accessible for immigrants as well as people in low-income communities. I just think we need to get the old white fucks out of power. But that's not really a Constitution issue.

Speaker 7: 44:00

Putting that in the Constitution amendment. Get rid of the old white people.

Speaker 6: 44:03

Yes, well, second Amendment needs to be altered because it was written at a time when there weren't assault rifles that kill hundreds of people Gun issues we're having right now. I feel like those definitely need to be changed. Anybody shouldn't be able to purchase a firearm. It just that shouldn't be the case. We are very behind as far as especially firearms. I don't think everyone has the right on them anymore. I mean violence, and this country has the most mass killings. I think that definitely needs man.

Speaker 4: 44:29

Someone's moved far from her country roots. So I play this because this is the kind of stuff that these liberal women want to see in the constitution nothing about finance, nothing about empowering other women. They immediately default to trans, illegal immigration, gun control, and so I just think it's funny, because there's really nothing positive about what they're saying and they're all ugly. I don't know why they all wear costumes of. If they have gray in their hair, they let it sit, which you know I don't like that from my beauty background. But whatever, horn-rimmed glasses, yellow teeth I mean the one representative from Oregon right now that's running around, I mean it looks like she's got about 10 extra teeth in her mouth.

Speaker 4: 45:14

Interestingly enough, we just got the 2024 American Family Survey and it revealed a wide gap in how women between the ages of 18 and 40 feel about their lives, depending on their ideology. Young liberal women are markedly less satisfied with their life than conservative peers. Specifically, we found that 37% of conservative women reported being completely satisfied with life, whereas only 12% of liberal women did. The study found it continues to say young conservative women are three times as likely to report being very satisfied with life compared to young liberal women. Moreover, liberal women are two to three times more likely to report they are not satisfied with their lives compared to conservative women, and the pie charts and all the research is very interesting. I'm definitely going to pop that up on the website after the show, but it's really crazy. Conservative women are 20 percentage points more likely to be married, 43 percentage points more likely to be churchgoing. And so what they're saying is I'll read you this quote from Brad Wilcox, who's part of the family survey. He said we've seen in the research that conservative women tend to be more likely to embrace a sense of agency and to have the sense that they are not in any way the victim of a larger structural realities or forces. He's a sociology professor at the University of Virginia. They are also much less likely to over-dramatize public events and concerns, more likely to think of themselves as captains of their own faith.

Speaker 4: 46:46

Conservative women the survey was 3,000 Americans found that women ages 18 to 40 are much more likely to report feelings of loneliness, with 29% feeling they feel lonely few times a week or more, compared to the only 11% of the conservative women 29%. Miserable Goes on to say the survey concluded that the ideological divide does not appear to just be a consequence of negative thinking. It also seems to flow from the fact that liberal young women are less likely to be integrated into core American institutions, specifically marriage and religion, that lend meaning, direction and a sense of solidarity to women's lives. I mean study after study after study shows people who go to church, people who read their Bible, have a better life than people who don't. They make more money, they have healthier lives, they have better relationships. It's a non-debatable issue. I personally did not know the correlation between happiness, satisfaction and marriage. I thought it would be the other way around. All my married friends are freaking miserable. But it's true. These core institutions of America are part of our success.

Speaker 4: 47:54

The liberals want you to believe that we've all been born and conditioned to be religious and conditioned to get married and marriage is just a way to control women. It's just another misogynistic, sexist institution in America's widespread sexism and anti-women policy. It's crazy. It's all a lie. We are not conditioned into those institutions. This is not something that our parents have sort of raised us to automatically feed into these institutions. This is not something that our parents have sort of raised us to automatically feed into these institutions. Plenty of people have extremely religious parents and end up being non-religious adults. Plenty of people have great married parents who end up not getting married. When you study toddlers and children in groups, they all go towards, without any sort of push, if you will, in a right direction. They all flock towards these institutions and social groupings in sort of child form that we see as adults.

Speaker 4: 48:53

So this is why I believe that liberal women are struggling right now, because they've waged war against freedom and choices. I know they say they're pro-choice, but they're only pro-choice about one thing, and so they're miserable because they've convinced themselves that the way that we do things is wrong. But there's so many other women who have done those things and are happy and refuse to buy into the propaganda, and that upsets them. You can see it on TV. You can see Rachel Maddow. She's got to be miserable in her life. She just looks miserable. They all look miserable. So not only are liberal women ugly, but they're also completely miserable in their own lives, and a lot of these female liberal journalists are that way. I mean, listen, we just had the Super Bowl last week. We all saw Taylor Swift get booed, and before I get into detail, I'm going to take a quick break and be back after these words.

Speaker 7: 49:50

As a pet owner, we understand that your pets are part of the family and you do anything to help them if they got sick or injured. Unfortunately, many pet parents will find themselves caught off guard by an expensive veterinary bill, and that's where Pets Best comes in. We provide pet insurance solutions for dogs and cats that can be used at any veterinarian in the US, including emergency and specialty clinics. Pets Best offers one of the most flexible products in the industry, with a wide range of coverages, including optional wellness coverage, exam fee coverage and more. When something happens, we pay your claims fast. Filing a claim is as easy as snapping a photo of your vet bill from your smartphone. Our online portal gives you easy access to see your claim status, manage your policy, check your benefits and more. You'll also have access to 24-7 live veterinary help through phone chat or email. Over 125,000 pets are protected from unexpected vet bills by Pets Best. Are your pets ready to join? Get a quote today.

Speaker 4: 50:58

Let me just put this in a realistic perspective for you guys. Okay, I've talked about this so many times. What do I say about Eagles fans? They are the most cutthroat, gnarly barbaric, animalistic fans you could ever see for an NFL team. Okay, vaseline power poles that's how excited they get. They have to climb up the telephone poles.

Speaker 4: 51:20

Taylor Swift is basically wearing a Chiefs jersey. She's dating the number two player on the entire Chiefs team. She was getting booed by Eagles fans who just don't want the Chiefs to win. That's all. It wasn't a big thing.

Speaker 4: 51:34

But of course, stephanie McNeil, who's the senior editor for Glamour magazine, was at the Super Bowl and she believes that Taylor Swift getting booed at the Super Bowl means that toxic masculinity is back. Fox News covered it. I also read her full story, but one of the things she said was Since Donald Trump took office, there have been several times I felt chilled by the rapid increase in misogyny sleeping in our culture. Why Taylor Swift getting booed at the Super Bowl was even more chilling than you think is the line that opens the article. According to McNeil, watching Taylor Swift at the Super Bowl get booed by a crowd of thousands on Sunday night was a new low, again blaming Donald Trump for the fact that Taylor Swift gets booed. It's not his fault. She has spoken, said what she has to say and she's getting a response from people.

Speaker 4: 52:24

The craziest part about this and again it's just this liberal woman her, probably the friend she was with. They all look like they had seen a ghost. They were so shocked that there would be any negativity towards Taylor Swift. And it's only because she's a woman. We can't boo women. It's misogynistic. But if it was someone else like Joe Biden and it's only because she's a woman, we can't boo women, it's misogynistic. But if it was someone else like Joe Biden, it's OK, right? No, because when Joe Biden gets booed and FJB and all the things that happened while he was running for president and in office, that was ageism and racism and billionaire elitists trying to silence him. You know, whatever they always have something. So now the booing of Taylor Swift was an attack on women. According to these liberal women who, by the way, are miserable and ugly Taylor Swift's probably the only good looking liberal woman I've ever seen. To me, they all look like kind of Katie Hobbs is sort of the poster child for that look.

Speaker 4: 53:21

In my opinion, she says to me, the disparate reactions felt like a message that the Super Bowl, one of the biggest cultural events in the country, has been reclaimed by Trump and the toxic type of masculinity he appears to be the beacon of, and he and his supporters seem to be living for it. Now, remember, when Trump won, they invented a new category of voter. They call it the bro vote, and that's how they disparage Joe Rogan. Many of you most of my listeners are, you know, in their mid-20s, early 30s, college-educated males. But just like you, you guys aren't bros. I'm not a bro. I love Joe Rogan. I'm not a bro. I've been listening to him since he started his podcast.

Speaker 4: 54:09

I mean this whole concept that they can group people in together to try to justify their screams of racism and sexism. Let me tell you something Taylor Swift's booing had nothing to do with sexism or racism or white privilege or billionaires or anything. They take any phenomenon in society and mold it and shift it in a way that they can stuff it down our pipes to make us feel guilty and worried that feminism is out the window and women are having their rights taken away. No, if it's not one, it's the other. This woman is the epitome of how awful liberal women have created a culture of their own demise. What she did say and I do want to read this quote, as an image of the president, stone faced and standing in a salute was shown to the crowd during John Batiste's national anthem performance. The roar of approval and cheers was deafening. But she says in parentheses of course there were those in the crowd who booed the president and cheered for Swift as well, but from my vantage point it was clear that the overall sentiment was again misogynistic.

Speaker 4: 55:12

This is a reach, people, this is a reach. This is football, this is sports. If you're going to come out and you're going to root for a team, you're going to get hammered. The same thing happens to Matt McConaughey when he goes to away games for Texas, the other team, you don't think Alabama booze, matthew McConaughey. You don't think Oklahoma booze, matthew McConaughey. I mean, give me a break. When you come out and support a team, you're going to get hatred from the opposing teams.

Speaker 4: 55:40

But no, no, it's misogynistic and all the bros and the bro vote are coming to take away the women's rights and breed this toxic masculinity. Toxic masculinity meaning uh, we work, we want to marry, we want to have sex, but all the biological sort of programming we have. If we want to use that to our advantage, work, grow. We're misogynistic. They just want a bunch of spineless boobs that sit around and let their women tell them exactly what to do. The concept of stay at home dads and all these other idiotic just completely reverse evolutionary ideals and it's only hurting society. But it all comes from the fact that these women are miserable, and the survey we just talked about it proves it. Well, I think that's all for today, folks. I'm Chad Law, reminding you of what Reagan once said Education is not the means of showing people how to get what they want. Education is an exercise by means of which enough men, it is hoped, will learn to want what is worth having.

Speaker 8: 56:50

God bless you, president Reagan, and may God save America you've just listened to the last gay conservative podcast hosted by chad law. Please like, subscribe and share. The views and opinions expressed in this program are those of the speakers and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent. This episode and others are available on LastGayConservativecom or anywhere you listen to podcasts. The Last Gay Conservative is recorded and published in Newport Beach, California. All rights reserved 2025.