Hello and welcome back to another episode of the Last Gay Conservative Podcast. I'm your host, Chad Law, America's binary brother, the holiest homo. Some even say the gayest conservative of all time. Restoring common sense conservative politics in the American household by sending our truth through the airwaves on the only rainbow that matters. It's the red, white, and blue rainbow, folks. Don't forget our phone number, 866 LastGay. Don't forget to text or call or leave a voicemail message if you remember what one of those is. That's too much. Wherever you're listening right now, you can open the description of the episode on your device. There's a link. It says text the show. Click it and send me a direct message. Folks, I'm merely a messenger of the common sense collective of folks like you and I, and I truly value everything you have to say. So please send me your feedback and I'll bring it up on the air. Well, it's Wacky Wednesday today, and my inbox is loaded with hilarious things that many of you have sent me, so thank you. I almost feel like every day's Wacky Wednesday currently, but it's so important we take some regular time out to laugh at some of the craziness. You can't take these freaks on the left and these new neo-fascist conservatives that have merged with Marxists too seriously, or else we'd go crazy. That's what Wacky Wednesday is all about. Speaking of wacky, Gavin Newsom was in Davos, Switzerland this week for the World Economic Forum in his sad attempts to parrot Trump, Newsom showed up, attacked the president, attacked the United States, all to wind to an elitist group of billionaires who enjoyed circle jerking each other off and talking about how much better they know than the rest of us in the world. But in a desperate attempt to seem relevant, he got a taste of his own medicine from Scott Besent. The phrase is hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. The new phrase should be hell hath no fury like a slightly inconvenienced homosexual. Scott Besent channeled his inner queen and read Newsom like a library book. He is now officially, according to me, the GOAT of Newsom trolling. On top of that, Bill and Hillary Clinton are in hot water as they are held in contempt of Congress for not showing up for their congressional testimony regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Interesting that no one really in the mainstream media is covering this, especially because we know that if anyone on the right, including Donald Trump, had blatantly failed to appear in Congress, they would have said it's an automatic admission of guilt. That's exactly what this is. But my questions are these. What can they know that we don't know already? What can they actually achieve? And won't a contempt criminal complaint just end up with all the other hundreds and dozens of criminal complaints on Pam Bondi's desk? I mean, folks, it's been two months since they rushed to pass the Epstein Files Act, and nothing has come of it. However, Jelaine Maxwell's on her way to testify, and the Democrats should be very scared, which I'll talk about when we come back. The wackiest story of the week, however, is that a$1 million federal grant created to curb school violence after the 2018 Parkland school shooting is now being used to create a more welcoming and warm environment for an influx of violent immigrant children. Folks, you can't make this stuff up. This is constant theft and fraud and how the bureaucracy misuses funds in every form of government. See, we're good people. We vote to support things like school safety with our tax dollars and expect triple arms, early detection systems, maybe more security guards. Same with homelessness. We want money to go to these causes, but the ideologues who run bureaucracies pay nonprofits for these indirect programs. In other words, they change the rules mid-game and redefine the terms, and it's truly sick. And now it's impacting our child's safety at schools. All to promote immigration welfare, and it has to stop. This is all born and bred and stems from Washington, D.C. and Congress. And I'm going to break down what we can do to ensure this doesn't keep happening. But because it's Wacky Wednesday, we also have to go over the left's biggest lies of the week from serial liar degenerates like Joy Reed, Harry Sisson, and Jojo from Jurs. And folks, it wouldn't be Wacky Wednesday if we didn't check in with our patients at the last gay syphilis recovery center, with Alex Jones offering his daughter and the rest of his assets to Nick Fuentes in some form of arranged marriage. Coincidentally, the only dowry he has left is two goats, a cow, and six pigs. Oh well, and his daughter, but good luck figuring out which one she is in that mix. The oddest part was that Fuentes was only interested in the goats. Guess that 1% Middle Eastern Arab and that DNA test is a lot stronger than he thinks. But on that note, I'm going to take a quick break and we'll be back with all of that and more right after these words. Like I mentioned before the break, Gavin Newsom was in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum. Now, first of all, what is he doing in Switzerland for the World Economic Forum? World Economic Forum is for world leaders. Last time I checked, California was a state out of 50. The other irony of his attendance at the World Economic Forum is that he manages probably the weakest economic state in the Union. It also has about 12% of the entire country's population. But now that they're calling it unsheltered homeless, come to find out they have over 50% of the nation's unsheltered homeless population. So it's ironic that he thinks that he would have a seat at the table anyway. And the hilarity is that so many people criticize Donald Trump for his initial criticism of the World Economic Forum that has largely come around now to stop the alarmist, crazy climate stuff, all the socialist, globalist, and pro-bureaucratic nonsense that was coming out of there. The tone of the World Economic Forum has largely shifted. And they actually had some pretty decent speakers this year. However, Newsom, again, constantly trying to parrot Trump, went with the intention to criticize the country, criticize ICE, criticize Trump, and he fell flat on his face. Let's have a listen to some of the things that he had to say when he was permitted to speak at the World Economic Forum.

I'm not naive. These guys are going to try to take me down. Not just my state. I'm not naive about what I've said this morning and how that will be reflected in the official White House account. I'm not naive about the fact that he threatened to prosecute the Fed chief in the United States of America that's has subpoena against another sitting governor, Tim Waltz, who's literally going after his enemies with the FBI and the DOJ and these power ministries. I'm not naive about any of this. I'm not naive about the corruption and the graft at scale we've never seen in American history. I'm not naive about folks writing billion-dollar checks to Witkoff, to Jared Kushner for this new peace deal they're announcing today. I'm not naive about the fact the President of the United States made a billion and a half plus dollars in the last 12 months personally. How the hell are we putting up with this? We have to call this out unprecedented in American history, happening in real time on our watch. We have to be held to a higher level, all of us, myself notably, to a higher level of accountability at this moment.

Okay, so that's his sort of first rant that is actually the more professional of the several different versions of his talk. However, it's very important that we point out everything that he's saying here, because he's talking to the world and he's talking about things that are unprecedented in American history. The first thing he talks about is Trump subpoenaing a sitting governor, Tim Waltz. Why? Because Tim Waltz falsely narrated in between gaps of a law enforcement story that created riots, crime, and cost millions of dollars in cleanup organization, overtime law enforcement, et cetera. But it's also about the money. And these people have no regard for your and I's money at all, including Gavin Newsom. Now he's talking about people writing million-dollar checks for rebuilding Gaza. Again, for the first time ever, we have the Middle Eastern countries that have been largely closed off to the West engaging in open economic and investment conversations with us to rebuild a part of the world that's been completely destroyed. It's a living, breathing humanitarian crisis 24-7. And we finally have leaders that are willing to work with our traditionally closed-off Middle Eastern, I would say, what, colleagues or now allies, and engaging with the private sector and engaging with nationalist leaders of these places. So the rebuild can take place honestly, transparently, and with the actual interests of Gaza, the people of Gaza, the people of Israel, the people in the Middle East at the forefront, instead of like we did with Iraq, George W. Bush, which by the way, Gavin Newsom was in full support of the war in Iraq, just like Hillary Clinton, just like Nancy Pelosi. And they also approved and sat back while they approved huge contracts to people like Joe Biden's brother. So for him to say this is unprecedented, these checks being written, not only is it not unprecedented, the part that is unprecedented is that you have equal cooperation between the private markets, Middle Eastern leadership, and the US. That's unprecedented, and we should be very proud of that. And the fact that we're able to get the private industries involved in this rebuilding effort without overpaying and having to do all this investment with our tax dollars is huge. It's similar to what he's trying to create in Venezuela with the oil companies, relying on the private market that does what it does best and letting the government handle the things that it does best. And he's being critical over that. That's silly. And then he wants to talk about they're coming after me. They're coming after you because you've broken the law. There's$24 billion in unemployment money missing. So again, it's poor me. I'm the victim. The other comment that he made that is so disgusting is that his people are going after these power ministries. What does he talk about? The FBI. Hello? His best friend, Merrick Garland, is the one who prosecuted all of Biden's enemies. Created an entire nonsensical story about January 6th. And the same type of insurrection activity is happening in blue cities all over America with unarmed militias and they support it. But the unarmed militia that went in to express their disgust with the election in 2020 and the way Congress and the Senate was handling it, sure, they're the problem. So you can see how scripted and polished he sounds when he says these things, and it's with so much confidence as he sits back like the cool guy and says these things that are blatant lies. All right, let's have a listen to what else he had to say.

Telling out what a makes America great and breaks my heart. You're running around distributing knee pads to CEOs. But we do have a few if you'd like to know either. And honestly, it sounds and you're by the way, I'm not kidding. They're the new Trump signature series, knee pads. Um they are available online.

I told you the last one's sold out. Well, you heard it, folks. He says right here that we should expect higher levels of accountability in government, yet every time he's held accountable, he lawyers up and avoids the question. Again, all he does is criticize Trump because he can't talk about anything that he's accomplished because he hasn't accomplished anything. Again, what's the name of the game, folks? World Economic Forum. What is he talking about? Bullshit. Nothing but socialist elitist talking points about alliances and destruction, and now they're using the term republic when they were using democracy forever. The guy just talks and talks and talks, and all it is is negativity without any substance. And it's disgusting. And this is why people like this shouldn't be allowed to represent our country because he doesn't know what he's talking about, he doesn't know what he's saying. And to stand up there and criticize European leaders, well, guess what? Do you know that the average road in the UK, the average road project in the UK now takes 30 years from start to finish to complete when the private sector could do it in nine months? I just read a new report. The average road infrastructure program in the UK takes 30 years. That is when you call a place uninvestable. That is the same with California and the high-speed rail. So the wacky, funny part about the story for Wacky Wednesday, isn't newsome. And I could sit up here like I did with his speech and go through everything that's wrong. I just wanted to show what a slimy piece of crap he is. But it doesn't matter because everything he said went right out the window when Scott Bescent stood up and told him exactly where to go. And that's what I want you all to listen to and enjoy.

Ironic that, you know, Governor Newsom, who strikes me as Patrick Bateman, meets Sparkle Beach Ken, uh, may be the only Californian who knows less about economics than Kamala Harris. Uh the uh he's here this week with his billionaire sugar daddy, Alex Soros. And the uh Davos is a perfect place for a man who, when everyone else was on lockdown, when he was having people arrested for going to church, he was having thousand dollar a night meals at the French laundry. And I'm sure the California people won't forget that. And I can tell my message to Governor Newsom is the Trump administration is coming to California. We are going to crack down on waste, fraud, and abuse. And I was told he was asked to give a speech on his signature policies, but he's not speaking because what have his economic policies brought? Outward migration from California, a gigantic budget deficit, the largest homeless population in America, and the poor folks in the Palisades who had their homes burned down. He is here hobnobbing with the global elite while his California citizens are still homeless. Shame on him. He is too smug, too self-absorbed, and too economically illiterate to know anything.

Is he not the best, folks? I mean, this guy is so awesome. First of all, he's one of the smartest guys in the world. Second of all, what he's done for our economy already is so underreported and so underrated. I mean, the guy has done so. Our Treasury Department is for the first time since Ronald Reagan finally heading in the right direction. And inflation is going down as wages are going up, industry is starting to boom, the private sector feels a sigh of relief. And that's one of the things that I want to talk about in this context is why so many people at the Economic Forum were trying so hard to criticize Trump. But many of the economists, many of the people there couldn't really say much because not only has Trump and the United States made them all millionaires or billionaires in this case, but also because it's working. Nationalism is working in the places that are embracing it. Italy back on track, Spain back on track, and you've got the United States worth now back on track. And the global countries that refuse to start embracing their own nationalism and putting their own self-interest first, those people are flailing. And guess who they're running to for bailouts and support? China. That's what Carney just did in Canada. So my favorite economist is Ken Griffin right now. He's the one that really made the most sense at Davos. He's the leader of Citadel. And um, I love when he gets on what he calls the doom and gloom panel and actually talks that, you know, all these people making uh drawing comparisons to the 1920s before the crash in the 1920s. And he breaks down why it makes no sense to draw that comparison. And I want to play that for you now.

The area of recklessness is the spending of governments around the world who are all, with little exception, all spending well beyond their means. That's the recklessness of this moment in history. This is not a parallel to the 1920s in terms of the recklessness of the of the private capital markets. It's a story of the recklessness of government spending. Within the private sector, there's a huge question as to where AI will take us. And I was carefully taking notes and listening to what Larry has to say or to what Madame Lagarde has to say, because this is one of the big issues of our moment. Will AI create the productivity acceleration that is honestly this hoped for in Washington and in the halls of government around the world as a ways to overcome the profligate spending that we're currently engaged in? Like the world, the world needs a savior. And the hope is that AI is the savior that we need for productivity.

Isn't that amazing? I mean. For the first time, someone is actually saying, hold the governments accountable, not the private sectors. I mean, first of all, the governments have done everything they can since the 1920s to create welfare states amongst the West and Western civilization. And because of that, they have become these bureaucratic messes that, in order to maintain the welfare state and this these big, large central governments, they need these bureaucracies to push paper that are bloated and bloated and bloated and bloated and bloated. And they continue to spend more, hire more without attaching any quantifiable results. If shit hits the fan, like we saw in the crash 1929, it's not going to be because of the private market. I mean, the private markets are largely so regulated that this sort of failure can't even really happen at that level anymore. I mean, I guess it could, but it would be very, very difficult. So what we've seen now in the last hundred years is a paradigm shift between the irresponsibility that can occur with excessive greed and capitalism having the same economic impact as bloated, bureaucratic, over an irresponsible governance and spending. And he'll go on to talk about, and I'm not going to play it today because it's wacky Wednesday, but we will talk about it in tomorrow, is that he goes on to say that when stocks and bonds basically become unilateral and the price of stocks and bonds goes up and down together, that is the result of this economic disaster that's happening on the government level. Because the value, the treasury notes, et cetera, and the private market should not necessarily go hand in hand. But by creating and overspending and living above their means, the governments have created a linkage to the private market now where stocks and bonds go up and down together, which they should not. The strength of bonds should not be determined based on the private sector. And so it's very interesting to finally hear someone at one of these forums speak the truth. But for Gavin Newsom to sit up there and act like he is someone to even have a seat at the table there is ridiculous. And his policies and his procedures and his programs have failed everyone. And he thinks he can act in Parrick Trump because he thinks it's funny or it's popular, but really he just makes himself look worse. And for Scott Besent to go up there and say what he said, I love that man. And it's such a breath of fresh air to see a smart, principled, ethical, gay man in such a high, prestigious level of the world, politics, geopolitics. It is so refreshing because largely uh examples of gay leaders have fallen flat, and and and have uh we end up with people like Scott Wiener and George Santos and Milo Yanninopoulos. So good for Scott Bassent. I'm excited that he had the opportunity to let Newsome have it. And he did, he destroyed him because it's true, you shouldn't be speaking at a World Economic Forum when economically all you have done is cause death and destruction at a Soviet Union level of death and destruction based on your policies. No one wants to talk about the humanitarian crisis in California that's come out of all this stuff. The amount of people that are dying on these streets, the amount of people that are dying of drug overdoses, the amount of people that are dying while they're waiting to get medical care because the medical system is so congested with illegal aliens. The amount of death and destruction and poverty that has come from these policies is worse than Vladimir Putin. Yet he thinks he deserves a table at the World Economic Forum. Well, if that's not wacky, I don't know what is, folks. When we come back, talk a little bit about Bill and Hillary Clinton and what we can expect from Jelaine Maxwell when she testifies in Congress soon. All that more when we come back after these words. Welcome back, America. And like I mentioned, Bill and Hillary Clinton are in some hot water for failing to appear in front of the House Oversight Committee in Congress regarding Jeffrey Epstein. We all knew they weren't going to show up. It's a blatant admission of guilt. Anything they say under oath is going to be a lie, so why even show up? What they're doing, though, is just strategy. Eventually, we probably will see them. But it's important that you understand how this works. So they didn't show up to the committee. The committee has to vote then to move forward, essentially, with charges of contempt of Congress. Okay. After the committee votes, then it has to go to the full floor of the House of Representatives before they issue the contempt complaint. That they need, you know, a few Democrats to vote with them, and then that can get referred to the DOJ for them to get arrested for not appearing. That's probably not going to happen. What's probably going to happen is like they said, they're just trying to test the waters and see exactly what they're trying to get from them and ask if they can't submit more written evidence or written statement, et cetera. Funny enough, every single Democrat on the House Oversight Committee voted to subpoena the Clintons. They all voted to subpoena the Clintons. Then, when it came to voting to refer a contempt of Congress charge to the floor, seven Democrats voted to refer Bill, and three Democrats voted to refer Hillary. Many of the same people that voted to subpoena them did not vote to issue or refer contempt of Congress complaints to the floor that would then get referred to the DOJ. Again, there's multiple steps that have to occur. So for those of my colleagues that are out there talking about Bill and Hillary sharing a jail cell, it's funny, but it's not gonna happen. But I want to talk more importantly about Jelaine Maxwell coming and why I think the Democrats should be really scared of this. Jelaine Maxwell is miserable in prison. She has said this over and over and over again. She is the only living witness and the only person left on this planet other than living victims and the other perpetrators, but the only full picture witness, I should say, that understands and knows the truth about what happened. I don't, you don't, no one knows other than the people that were in the rooms at the time or when some of this alleged sexual assault took place. But we know Jelaine Maxwell is a filthy, dirty liar. She always has been. Nothing that she says can be trusted. And her and Jeffrey Epstein are the masters of self-preservation and deflecting accountability to other people to avoid being in trouble or the worst punishment or prosecution or whatever that might be. That's largely you see these letters to Jeffrey Nasser, all these, you know, Jeffrey Epstein was in the midst of trying to create a dotted line perception of the president, like he was involved to use as leverage to try to stay out of jail. We know that was happening. Okay? And he didn't just do it with Donald Trump. He he he blackmailed and kept information on all of these people in case he ever needed it in the past, and I think to leverage for financial gain, but that is not necessarily proven. The point that I'm trying to make here is that when you have someone like Jelaine Maxwell, who is in the business of self-preservation, she is going to say whatever she needs to say to stay in favor with the Trump administration and the current DOJ. She's going to offer up information and she's going to make anyone that stands in her way look very bad. Well, guess what? That's the Democrats. The Democrats have now turned around this whole Epstein situation and made it about Donald Trump. Now, Jelaine Maxwell, in multiple depositions, has said she didn't see Donald. She didn't know Donald. She wasn't aware that Donald participated with any of the girls. It's right there in black and white in her depositions. She said it over and over again. All right? She has talked about President Clinton. She did talk about Prince Andrew. So she's largely come out and said what we know she's going to say. But now she has the opportunity to what I talk about all the time, narrating the gaps in the story as really the only living, breathing witness to everything. She can now narrate the gaps in the story to make herself look less guilty and to make the Clintons look more guilty. And what I love about this is the Democrats are turning on the Clintons, which means that they've completely lost their position with the DNC, which reaffirms what I've been saying over and over again, which the DNC is now the Democratic Socialists of America Party. Listen, if this was Obama's Democratic Party, there would be no Democrats voting to subpoena the Clintons. But now you have an entire oversight committee voting unanimously to subpoena them, multiple Democrats voting to hold them in contempt. So their stronghold in the DNC is gone. And if these Democratic Socialists of America want to position themselves as the new, better, fresher, younger version of the Democratic Party, they'd be smart to throw the Clintons under the bus. We'll see if they do that. But I think that's what's going to happen here. I think they're going to use this as a way to say this represents the old way of doing things. That's not what the Democratic Party is anymore. We're the DSA. Just like they did in a way to remold themselves and remove the shit stain of slavery, Jim Crow, racism and discrimination, and all the other things, KKK, that come along with the Democratic Party. They're masters at remolding and throwing people under the bus as they do it. And Clintons are up next. Guarantee it. So this is very interesting to watch and see. But I have a feeling that Jelaine Maxwell's going to come out and make Trump, again, be even more innocent, which then everyone's going to say, oh, she's just saying that because they moved her to a low uh security prison or whatever, because she's at Club Fed now. But you watch. And it might be within the DOJ's best interest or Trump's best interest to pardon her. I don't know. I don't think. I think she's a liar. I think she's just as responsible as Jeffrey Epstein. But again, if it if it's that's what it takes to get this all out on the table, to get her to open up about everything and everyone, to finally shut this thing down, then maybe that's what they need to do. But she is now in a position where she can make her life a lot easier or a lot harder. Remember, we only just finished the first year of the Trump administration. There's three more years that she would have to wait for a new administration if she thought that she'd have better favor with a Democrat or whomever the next president would be, which she knows she knows she doesn't. If she's gonna weasel her way out of anything, now is the time that she's going to do it. And that's largely because the Democrats have now set her up to be able to vindicate whoever she wants. And again, guys, these Epstein files, I just feel like I'm preaching to the choir, but again, if we knew anything new, we would have already known by now. There's nothing new. There doesn't need a special prosecutor, and the oversight committee shouldn't even be focusing on this. They should be focusing on fraud, theft, waste, and abuse. This is just gossip. This is not actual legislation or law happening. And so the Democrats, man, I mean, I have been watching this unfold, and I thought for sure they would never bring her to testify. Because she's sitting in a federal jail. And the jurisdiction over that prison and over her sentencing and over her case is the federal government that's ruled by Donald Trump. Whether you like it or not, this is just the reality of the situation. So if she hasn't any chance of getting her sentence commuted, getting pardoned, getting moved, you know, whatever it is that she wants, now is the time for her to vindicate the president and vindicate those involved in this gossip that don't deserve the persecution that's happening on the left. And the people who do deserve the persecution that's happening on the left are on the left, and we'll see if they actually put their money where their mouth is. No one's above the law, right? And how many times did the Democrats tweet that during Jack the Ripper Smith and Joe Biden's administration about Trump and Republicans they were going after? Now it's the shoes on the other foot and it's he's arresting his enemies, et cetera. But hey, they have set up Jelaine Maxwell in a perfect position for herself and for the Trump administration because she's gonna say and do whatever she has to to make her life a little easier. And it could just be getting an extra meal or getting, you know, an extra TV time or whatever. I mean, who cares? But the point is that they have now made her by pushing this Epstein story as far as they have, and by continually trying to make these arguments that Trump was involved in any illegal activities surrounding Epstein's trafficking operation is falling flat. And I believe Jelaine Maxwell will be the nail in the coffin. And I cannot wait to watch the wacky meltdowns happen as she just lays it all out there. When we come back, I want to talk a little bit about a$1 million grant that the federal bureaucracy is now using for more immigrant welfare, how wacky that is, and how it's just another prime example of what we need to do in order to get our country back, which is a convention of states. I'll talk to you about that and more right after these words. Welcome back, America. Let's talk about the wackiest story of the week, which is millions of dollars in grant money that was created and held in a program for public school safety managed out of Congress in Washington, D.C., where public schools could apply for grants that had general safety concerns and needed general safety funding in order to stop school shootings or potential acts of violence. The fund was created after the 2018 Parkland shooting in Florida. And ironically, openTheBooks.com, the same people that produced the annual pork report, discovered that out of$595 million that has been spent, millions have gone to indirect safety programs for illegal for illegal immigrants or children of illegal immigrants in these schools. The way the schools are justifying these grants is by saying that violent incidents and these illegal immigrant children go hand in hand. Therefore, English learning, individual counseling, psychologists, welcome, feel welcome at home programs are all being prioritized and used as a way to attain these funds that were made for actual infrastructure or structural changes to prevent school shooting. In other words, early detection, cameras, monitors, security guards, training for the teachers, bulletproof or reinforced doorways and one-way locks, magnet doors that slam shut when there's an emergency. Those are the kinds of things that taxpayers wanted when bipartisanly approved putting together this program. It is a stop school shooting fund. 595 million have already gone out to public schools around the country. However, there's all of these additional grants. And Rachel O'Brien, who's the director of policy or the editor of public policy for openthebooks.com, sat down on News Nation and sort of broke it down. Let's have a listen to what she said.

Yeah, it was created right after the 2018 Parkland school shooting. And it provides grants to school districts to prevent and reduce school violence. It pays for things like training staff, educating students on how to prevent school violence, developing threat assessment teams using technology and more. So what we're seeing is some funds are being spent on programs for Spanish-speaking immigrants. They're using it to develop an English language learner task force or hiring staff to promote social, emotional, English language immersion, or even providing small group or individual therapy for program students. So not at all what it was intended. So over the course of the program's existence,$595 million has been awarded. But they started addressing funding to immigrants in 2023 and Open the Books went back and found 15 grants worth$13.5 million. Sounds like a drop in the bucket compared to the$595, but it's$13.5 million that is being misspent. So for example, we saw SOTUS Central School District in New York. They got a million dollars to run what they call a place to belong initiative. I think that was for English language learners. Another million went to schools in Oxford, California. They have uh a high number of suspensions due to incidents of violence, including for those in the groups of English language learners being in that group. Yeah, uh they've they've mentioned this in their request for the funds, how they how they need to use it. Public schools are strained, right? Since since the Biden administration allowed millions of undocumented immigrants into the country, the schools have to allow them in. So in Monroe County School District in South Florida, they got a million-dollar grant in 24 intended to stop school violence. And they state specifically that Monroe County has experienced an influx of migrant families with a concurrent increase in juvenile crimes.

So if you really pay attention to what she says, it breaks it down threefold. The first is how these funds get misused, which is that the schools make these indirect dotted line arguments to safety and welfare. Basically, that's what this is. Things like free counseling, after-school programs, food, uh, you know, the list goes on and on. So they're trying to say that when you increase welfare, school safety improves. Again, it's the same Marxist uh argument that Karl Marx makes, basically, which is when you become a welfare state and everyone becomes equal, crime goes down, all these, you know, equity goes up, crime goes down. That's not true. And as I've said many, many times, and she's talking about it here, just reaffirms that all these increases in arrests, all these increases in disciplinary actions, all these increases in violence as it pertains to the children of immigrants or immigrant children, is that. And I've talked about it for years. It's not the immigrant, it's their kids that have the issues because they largely have self-identity issues that stem from living one way at home and another way at school and feeling completely left out, not feeling like they belong in school. And so being away from home during the day, for most people, when they go to school, it's just part of their life going in and out of school and home, school and home. Whereas when you have totally separate worlds, languages, cultures, et cetera, school feels completely foreign. So when you're going to act out, you're going to act out in the area that you feel less welcome and more foreign than at home. It's common sense stuff. But we saw this happen with the large number of gang population in the 90s in California, were largely children of mass illegal immigration that happened throughout the 80s and early 90s. And then the later 90s and the 2000s, as we saw gangs like MS-13 and more and more Mexican and Latin gangs compounding in numbers all over Southern California was due to the fact, largely that these were children of illegal immigrants. So that's one of the things that largely goes unspoken. And now these schools are saying, hey, we are having safety issues when it has to do with the children of illegal immigrants. And we need money to teach them English. And because if we get them, you know, into the program, if we get them assimilated into the program, they'll be less violent. But that again, there might be merit to that argument. I don't think so. But there may be merit to the argument that if you make them feel more at home in schools, they'll be less violent. Fine, but that's not what this money is about. And this is the pattern of our government and the bureaucracy is that it's never directly making it to the people it needs to make it to. So first, this fund gets created, all this money goes in. Well, the first thing you have to do is hire all these bureaucrats to manage and administrate these funds and this new program. So put a million dollars in, let's say, you know, half of it for the year goes off the top just to salaries of these people. Then you've got their lifetime benefits and their pension fund. But okay, so you've got that just to manage it. Then they funnel the money through these programs, these nonprofit programs and public schools or that serve public schools. And they create any sort of argument they can in order to get their hands on this money. And because, again, immigration welfare was the number one priority of the Biden administration, that's what they did. They said, Oh, perfect. We can help immigrants indirectly through this public safety program. Well, guess what? Now there's not enough money in the pot for alarms, security guards, guns, pepper spray, or whatever else we thought the funds were gonna go to. And this is what happens with homelessness as well. People say, give us the money. We'll get these people out of the hospitals, we'll help it, but no, because then it's salaries, lifetime benefits, pensions first, and then it's got to cross all these hands, and money never makes it to the actual homeless person. The same thing happens with the school system. The money never makes it to the students. So this just comes to show you how little Democrats care about school shooting because the only thing they've ever tried to solve, or the only thing they've ever used to try to solve violence in this country, is gun control, which we know doesn't work. Hello, Australia. Did everyone just see all those people get killed in Australia? So the only argument they have is gun control. So they say, why not? There's millions of dollars there. Send it to make children of immigrants and immigrant children feel more welcome at schools. That that could be considered a type of safety. No. But if we don't start looking at the implications, the negative implications that come out of immigration later, generations later, we're gonna see, again, exactly what this shows. School violence, arrests, and incidence of gang violence and gang activity in schools is gonna increase with this huge influx of illegals that came over the border over Biden. We already saw it in California, folks. And gangs are the biggest perpetuators of violent crime and the drug trade, period. And they want to take this money that's made to protect kids and make it again just into another welfare pot. Everything we vote for and support, somehow or another, ends up as welfare instead of directly helping the people. And I have largely been so pro using community local nonprofits to funnel money in rather than hiring and increasing the bureaucratic state because these people are on the ground, they know. But I guess I've been wrong, or maybe it's not all of the nonprofits, but it looks like these nonprofits and the Democrats have really used the uh conservative sort of solution to this, which has always been let the community handle it, give the funds to the community, let them prioritize, manage these funds. And nonprofits seem to be an easy way to do that that wouldn't incur such a huge investment in an increase in government activity. But they've learned a way around how to get the funds and how to keep themselves very rich by creating indirect arguments and applying for grants that don't directly impact what they're doing or impact why the original intention of those funds were earmarked or put to the side on purpose. And that's where fraud, waste, and abuse comes in. I think nonprofits, 50 years from now, we're gonna look back, and nonprofits are going to be the largest perpetuators of theft and fraud that we have ever seen in the history of the world. Because it is essentially just a way to launder money back to political parties and politicians. So yeah, Rachel O'Brien breaks it down, and again, openthebooks.com comes up with the actual story that millions of dollars are getting sent to places like Oxnard, California, Miami-Dade schools in Florida, New York City to make kids of immigrants and immigrant children feel warm and welcome, in the argument that when they do that, their violent outbursts will stop. We know that's not true. The only way to stop violent outbursts is to ensure that the immigrant, in the first place, with their kids, are integrated, assimilated, want to be here, and want to contribute. It's just Milton Friedman talks about open immigration all the time. Pre-1914, our borders were totally open. Anyone who wanted to buy a ticket and come to the United States could come. Guess what we didn't have then, though? Welfare. There was no government standard on how people should be living. It was a free market. So people coming helped because they only wanted to come if they thought there was a better opportunity. They also brought other experiences and their other uh forms of knowledge and cultural uh contributions that helped. People that came over here also had to buy tickets, they had to be on boats for months. It was a huge commitment. Now, these migrant caravans can walk together and have Red Cross feed them and clothe them and shelter them their whole way, all the way up to the border, claim that they're asylum seekers, and sit here in this country and wait for our bloated backed up court system to send them back home. But while they wait, they can get driver's licenses, free education, free health care, everything else, have zero appreciation and wreak havoc. And then have children, largely known as anchor babies. And those children have no sense of self and create all kinds of problems in schools because of the separation of worlds from secular immigration, and then the public schools where they have to go with their other peers that represent a more realistic version of this country where they don't belong. So they act out. Folks, the only way we're going to stop this from happening is through a convention of states, Article V in the Constitution. I think there are 39 out of 50 states now, or 31, excuse me, that are in the process of approving or have already approved a Convention of States. Do yourselves a favor, go to Convention of StatesAction.com. I'm a huge supporter. I've been a part of that movement since it started, which was essentially during the Tea Party movement, which I was also a part of. I'm a volunteer writer for Convention of States, I'm an active participant, and a percentage of the money that we earn from advertisers, et cetera, on that on this show goes to Convention of States actions. Because the work they do in the field with politicians is credible. It's non-biased, it's nonpartisan. And there's only three things they want to focus on: fiscal restraints. So Congress has a limit, not an open-ended credit card, term limits, but putting term limits on Congress and ensuring that we restore the equal branches of representative government and lower the control of the administrative bureaucracy. That's it. I think almost every American could get behind that. Check out Convention of States Action. It is the only way we will get our country back. And these wacky Wednesday stories will continue to happen where people in Washington say, hey, it's not my money. I'm telling you folks, the theme song in Washington should be Give It Away Now by Red Hot Chili Peppers. Give it away now, give it away now, because that's all they do. At the expense of things like human life, child safety, and welfare amongst the poorest of the poor who actually need a hand up. They all suffer while these indirect nonprofit and public school programs for illegal immigrant kids and kids that are illegal immigrants, everyone else suffers so we can try to make them feel more warm and welcome. Misuse of funds is a terrible crime. And when this happens in the private sector, people go to jail. And we should have the same standard for our elected politicians and the fourth branch of government. No one elected or wanted the bureaucracy. When we come back, we'll do the left's biggest lies of the week and check in on our patients at the last gay syphilis recovery center for degenerates. After these words. Welcome back, America. And it wouldn't be a wacky Wednesday without the left's biggest lies of the week, starting with the number one pretty but stupid degenerate, Jojo from JERS, who posted this on Instagram. The U.S. is currently holding three times as many people in immigrant detention as were detained in the Nazi concentration camp system in spring of 1939, six years into the Third Reich and just before the start of World War II. Read that again, she says. Well, folks, let me just say this plainly because the topic deserves precision, not this crap. Comparing U.S. migrant detention centers to Nazi concentration camps is not just wrong. It's dangerous, historically inaccurate, and deeply disrespectful to Jews and Holocaust survivors. And I don't say that to shut down criticism of immigration policy. I say it because facts matter, numbers matter, and moral clarity matters. What's going on here? Let's be honest. First of all, Nazi concentration camps were created as instruments of state terror. They existed to remove people from society, strip them of legal rights, dehumanize them, exploit them, and ultimately, at many sites, kill them. It wasn't accidental. It was policy and it was deliberate. Places like Auschwitz, mass murder was the only point of that center. Folks, the migrant centers, they do have flaws, but they're civil facilities, they're temporary holding facilities while they process claims or enforcement actions. That's it. The distinction here, folks, is not just semantic, it's foundational. One system was designed to annihilate a people. This system is a bureaucratic, legally bounded enforcement system that can be criticized without rewriting history. That's all I'm saying. Let's talk about the numbers because this is where her argument collapses. Auschwitz is just one site of the Holocaust, 1.1 million people murdered, the vast majority of them Jews. And then across the whole system, millions, millions more were murdered, starved, beaten, worked to death, basically systematically exterminated. Death wasn't a failure, it was the intention. You look at U.S. detention centers, death while in detention is measured in dozens per year, not millions. They're investigated custodial deaths, not acts of mass killing. They occur within a system, however imperfectly, has reporting requirements, medical standards, inspections, lawsuits, media, scrutiny, and congressional oversight. None of that existed in Nazi Germany. JoJo from jurors, let me be clear. Acknowledging this is not me excusing, saying our detention centers are perfect. They're not. But using this verbiage is so dangerous. We have documentation of overcrowding, sanitation problems, medical lapses, but many of that stems from the fact that the elitists on the left want to hold these people here to wait for due process when they could go home and be waiting at home. That's why Trump's remain in Mexico policy was so successful. Because when they can wait here is when all the problems occur. So by removing the wait in Mexico policy and forcing people into migrant detention centers, it actually made them in much worse shape. And they do deserve some attention and reform. But we simply don't have enough judges to give all these people due process in a speedy, fair trial format, period. But even if you can call them overcrowded, unsanitary, or even negligent, this is not the same as industrialized murder. How do these people take this stuff so lightly? The Holocaust was about dehumanization, forced labor, starvation as policy, executions, beatings, gas chambers. And she wants to compare migrant detention centers to that. All that does is erase the facts of the Holocaust. And that's the only thing that's going to keep it from happening again, are the facts. They're anti-Semites. Genocide becomes another metaphor. And Jews and Holocaust survivors, it's just abstract. When really anyone who's ever been to the Holocaust Museum, either in DC or Los Angeles, you know this is not abstract. These are real people, real survivors, real victims. And then on the flip side, what it does is if when anyone comes out like me and says, you can't use this language, it's awful, they say, well, that's because you don't care about migrants. I mean, this is essentially anti-Semitism by totally disregarding the facts of the Holocaust. And then it undermines reform. Because when people hear historically absurd comparisons, they stop listening. Everyone does. So legitimate criticisms like medical care, and that's what I'm talking about about these groups, these militia groups that are largely led by these historical, hysterical left influencers. You don't need to use Holocaust language to argue for humane immigration policy. We already have oversight, we have reports, we have documented failures. Talk about that. Talk about the judges, talk about due process. The responsible way to talk about this is to say that migrant detention is a civil system with documented failures. We should say no one should die in government custody from neglect. Violating basic standards of care is also abhorrent as the United States. We shouldn't be doing that. And then she can say it morally, forcefully, persuasively without hijacking the language of genocide. You know, these people need to realize history is not a toolbox for shock value. The Holocaust is not a metaphor. Stop treating it like one. You're weakening our ability to argue and enter into meaningful conversation. And if you really care about migrants, which we know you don't, you really cared about the truth, which you know you don't, JoJo from jurs, you can hold everything that you want accountable in an effective way. But these influencers on the left don't care because they're in it for the clicks and the shock value, the same way that these neofascist conservatives have merged with them on the right. Furthermore, Harry Sisson is at it again. Another twink of the week left, whose future seems to be OnlyFans, is about the only option he'll have left, as he's largely become irrelevant. But he had the audacity to post this.

Donald Trump got booed at the national championship game in Miami tonight. Here's a video from inside the stadium.

An highly edited clip to try to demonstrate that Donald Trump was booed during the National College Championship football game this weekend. But I think a lot of people sense this, but don't always know how to articulate how these crowd reactions get edited in political clips and why these left-leaning influencers do it. Let's do this. I'll break it down a little bit more casual for you. And then you'll start noticing them everywhere. So as someone who's newly in broadcasting, I've learned a lot of this stuff. So the objective is not to report what actually happened. The objective is to shape the perception, right? Crowd reactions are the strongest form of social proof we have as humans. Because we think if other people aren't responding positively, something must be wrong. The leftist masters at this. That way you don't need to argue policy. You let the crowd do the work for you. And that's why they always show these edited clips of empty crowds are booing. The incentive structure behind a lot of these clips, like Harry Sisson, is based on not having to talk about policy. So what are the key techniques? Because this isn't guesswork, it's standard video and audio editing. The first thing they do is they use audio leveling. In rally footage, there are usually multiple audio sources, the microphone feed from the speaker and the ambient crowd microphones. So the editors, what they do is they keep the speaker's mic loud and clean while lowering the crowd track. But sometimes they compress it or they just turn it. Down. The result's subtle, but the applause is louder than the speaker. That's what they do. They make it sound like it's more powerful than the person when it really isn't. Next is selective timing. Applause isn't uniform. It goes up and down and swells and peaks. They start the clip after the applause has already begun or end it before the loudest moment. What you're left with is just the weakest part of the reaction from a small population. Then they do the same thing visually with visual cropping. You'll notice a lack of wide shots, no big pans or overhead angles, just tight frames on the speakers or on small sections of seats. You never show the scale, the full scale. They never do. Any clips, never. And then the last thing is they use a dead air emphasis. Because when speakers pause or the camera changes from Donald Trump on the big screen, this noise changes in the crowd. And psychologically, silence feels like rejection. So it seems like the silence creates a negative perception. They desynchronize and fragment the audio. These are all the things these people do just to try to make it look like Trump is losing the popularity contest because that's the only way these people know how to win. Is this repetition bias? If you show five clips in a row where applause sounds weak, but they're all selectively edited, you can create a narrative of unpopularity. And that's what these people do. It's just over and over and over again. And they do it because it works. We see this. Ridicule and humiliation perform extremely well on social media. Platforms reward content that triggers mockery, certainty, and group alignment. Period. A clip that looks awkward travels farther than a clip that makes someone look normal. There's also momentum warfare at play. Politics isn't just about votes, it's about belief and inevitability. If you convince someone that their support is fading, you're discouraging turnout and impacting the perception of the public. But this tactic isn't about persuasion through facts. This guy has no facts. He has no idea what he's talking about. He's an idiot. You're just training the viewer to associate a person with rejection, not arguments. Again, it falls flat. So, folks, what I'm going to say is here are three questions you want to ask yourself when you hear this stuff. Did you hear the crowd rise or is the sound flat? Do you see the full crowd or only the stage? And focus on whether or not the clip feels time to avoid peaks. If you answer these no, you're not watching documentation, you're watching narrative construction, which is exactly what these left influencers are paid to do. Just watch the full footage. I mean, even myself, I have all these shorts out there in the world and reels out there in the world. Some go viral, some fall flat, but they are edited from full episodes, and they we use AI to edit and pull out these clips. And sometimes the context is totally off, and we have a disclaimer on there that says, make sure you look at the full episode. So you have to look at it. So actually, I played Harry Sisson's clip. What is the real sound? So that was the real sound. Real popularity doesn't need sound engineering. Real rejection doesn't need cropping. When someone has to sculpt silence, all they're doing is trying to manipulate public perception of approval or rejection with heavy editing techniques, instead of just allowing policies, programs, and reality shape public perception. And that's why these people get paid by the DNC and left politicians thousands and thousands of dollars and have millions of followers. So yet another lie from Harry Sisson about Trump's booze when in actuality the crowd went wild. And I just played the unedited clip. The last left lie from the week, that's probably the biggest, comes from serial race beter degenerate Joy Reed. Wannabe Mary J. Blige with a wonky eye, was on Instagram and posted this. Joy Reed says, I guarantee a higher percentage of ICE agents have criminal records than immigrants they've taken into custody. Wow. That is a huge statement and a massive lie. I mean, the theme of this show, folks, is always asking yourself the question what am I not being shown? What am I not being told? And that's what these big click-bait statements and lies do. But I hear the phrase, the same phrase, ICE officers have worse criminal records than most of the illegals they detain and deport. I mean, it sounds provocative, it sounds morally charged, but when you really actually examine this, which is my job, the claim falls apart factually, logically, and analytically. Okay? So let's first look at what is she actually asserting here? It's not criticizing policy. It's making a comparative statistical claim about two populations. To be true, it would require clear definitions of criminal records, reliable data on both groups, and a valid comparison, but none of that exists. The claim is asserted, it's not proven. The first group she talks about is ICE officers, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Officers. Again, ICE officers are federal law enforcement employees. That matters. Before they are hired, they go through fingerprint-based criminal background checks, federal databases, suitability reviews, and ongoing monitoring. If an officer commits a serious crime, they're investigated, disciplined, fired, or prosecuted. Officers with disqualifying criminal convictions do not stay on the job, which includes DUIs. That means the baseline criminal history rate among active ICE officers is very low by design. You cannot have a felony and be in ICE. Now, if you compare that to illegal immigrants they detain and deport by her statement, that's not even a uniform population. Because it includes people who crossed the border unlawfully yesterday, visa overstays, asylum seekers, repeat, and then you have individuals with prior criminal convictions in the US or abroad. Do you see the lack of intelligence here, folks? There's no universal background checks before entry. Criminal histories can be made unknown, incomplete. They talk about vetting. These third world countries, there's no vetting, there's no records. The group isn't pre-screened. You can't even make that claim. So already the comparison is broken. You're comparing a heavily screened workforce to an unscreened population and presenting that it's apples to apples, and it isn't. Then you look at the visibility bias of all of this, which is absolutely astonishing. You look at misconduct. ICE officers are investigated, documented, publicized. There's reports, headlines, internal reviews. But criminal history among illegal immigrants, by contrast, is invisible until they're encountered by law enforcement. So what happens? The monitored group looks more criminal than the unmonitored group because they are being monitored, where the other group is in secret. That's not evidence of any higher criminality. It's asymmetric data. No serious person denies that there's ICE officers that have committed crimes, but individual cases are handled properly. So again, to claim that these ICE officers have criminal records is so dangerous because what it does is it adds to the narrative for people like Renee Good, the woman who just got shot, that these people are bullies just pulling triggers, grabbing people out of the streets, stopping and frisking people because they're brown, which then charges up people who have heavily invested into these social justice causes, either emotionally, financially, or physically. And then the very small population of those people that are a few tacos short of the combo plate, like Renee Good and her wife, go nuts and end up getting shot in the head. So that not only is this a reply to ice, but it's also a cause of the ICE challenges because more of this rhetoric is what charges more people, and more people that are charged creates a higher chance of it getting into the head of someone who's not all there, who then goes and does something completely drastic, like makes a U-turn on a one-way street and puts herself and her dog in front of a gun. But the ICE officers have criminal records? Come on, Joy, you can do better than this. You're better than this. You went to Harvard Law School. How is it these people that go to Harvard Law School say these things? It's crazy. So again, probably the biggest lie of the week, which I see has been reshared hundreds of thousands of times. ICE officers have criminal records worse than the illegals they detain and deport. That is not true. And you can go to the worst of the worst. Trump administration posts it so you can see what kind of illegal criminals are in this country still that they have not been able to detain. And the challenge is that they hide in plain sight and they know that it looks really bad. And the only chance of them getting away or not being caught is if ICE efforts are slowed down based on public pressure to politicians. So the criminals that deserve to leave go hide, just like Palestinians or Gazans or Hamas fighters did with children's hospitals, building their bases underneath. So when the Israelis go to attack, they can say, oh, look, they shut down a kid's hospital. No, you built a war base underneath a kid's hospital for that reason. These criminals go and they're working in agriculture and they're working in food and they're working in construction with the rest of the hardworking people that are just here for an opportunity who maybe don't deserve to be deported, but they hide in plain sight and then everyone goes down with them. That's what's happening. And it will not stop until people like Joey Reed stop making these outrageous charges, these outrageous claims and lies. Folks, when we come back, we'll do the last gay civilist recovery center for degenerates. Break down Alex Jones's arranged marriage proposal to Nick Fuentes right after these words. And we're back, folks. Yes, you heard me correctly. Alex Jones is trying to push an arranged marriage between his daughter and Nick Fuentes. Surprisingly, I think Nick Fuentes was a little bit more interested in Alex Jones than his daughter in the first place. His response was I don't want to be the gay police, but when a straight man in their 20s refers to women as children, that's very odd to me. Most straight men in their 20s are physically, very strongly physically attracted to women. That's all they can think about. And they wouldn't refer them to them as children. So that was very odd, that response that he made. But let's have a listen to what Jones says to Nick Fuentas.

I mean, me, I take a much more aggressive posture on that sort of thing. I mean, I I think that I don't want to offend your daughter. If your daughter's right there watching the show, but uh no, I think that women are like children. I I defer to Schopenhauer on this one. I think they are somewhere between children and men in terms of kind of where their mindset is at. And I I don't know that your female audience is gonna love that. Women don't love when I say that, but um, you know, that's why I'm uh I guess that's why I'm single. I guess that's why I'm a bachelor.

So I've gotten better since we since we let them vote.

Oh, things are much better since we gave women the vote. It has been a remarkable success story, and all you have to do is look at the history. The country's so much better off. Well, that was kind of when I realized something was wrong, because I realized they vote for the wrong person every time. If only women voted, it would have been Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris. If only men voted, it would be like um, you know, Trumpler. It would be it would be. But let's be fair.

It's like 60% are like the others. And if you notice, he doesn't mention it on this video, but there is a dowry that he also offered her, which was a couple cows, a few goats, and six pigs. Coincidentally, that's all that Alex Jones has left in assets. After he disgustingly went after the parents of that lost their children in Sandy Hook. He's lost everything. And now he's trying to pimp his daughter out to Nick Fuentes. Well, first of all, I wouldn't be able to tell his daughter from between the cows, the pigs, and the goats. Okay, she is one ugly girl. Second of all, why would you want your daughter to breed or be with a blatant racist? Okay, when Alex Jones has largely defended himself as not being a racist, not being an anti-Semite. We know it's not true, but he's defended that. At least Nick Fuentes just admits that he's those things. And then lastly, why on earth would you be pushing an arranged marriage in your year 2025, other than to use your daughter for more clickbait and headlines for your own personal popularity? Again, such degenerates. Folks, if this isn't brain rot from undiagnosed syphilis, I'm not sure what is. These people clearly have all gone to the same Qatari whorehouse, got syphilis, it's untreated, and their brains are gone. That's the only explanation for this type of behavior. On top of that, Candace Owens, another patient of ours at the syphilis recovery center, just lost her rank, consistently ranking on Spotify in the top 10 podcasts, now down to 57. She'll be below this show soon. And the funny thing about that is that the writing has been on the wall. There's only so much you can do with the salacious chick with dick Macron talk, and now her pretending that her and Charlie Kirk were BFFs, and now she's talking about time travel. I mean, the woman has lost her mind, and the only explanation can be syphilis or brain rot or something because we know she's smart. So, what's happened to these people? All we can do is monitor and hope that they can rest and recover from their syphilis, from the Qatari hooker or whoever they got syphilis from, and hopefully reverse that and come back and be the normal, cool people that we once knew them to be. That does not include Alex and Nick Fuentis. They've never been cool, they've always been degenerates, and both of them are just wastes of human life and space that deserve to go away, like gum on my shoe. But that's what we have for Wacky Wednesday today, folks. I'm out of time, but let me leave you with a quote from Charlie Daniels. What this world needs is a few more rednecks. God bless you, Charlie Daniels, and God bless and save America.